Jump to content

User:Tiff1194/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tiff1194 (talk | contribs) at 04:03, 22 July 2015 (Add Article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I. Freedom and control

       A. People are under the control of the physical environment; however, some may develop a greater dependence on the educator than others.  
              1. The less dependent a student is on an educator, the more advanced that child becomes.
       B. People in general are just as much dependent on the physical environment as they are dependent on other people.
              1. Educators should make attempt to shift dependency from teacher to physical world.
              2. Dependent students are under the control of personal approval.

II. Education systems are ultimately defective.

       A. Teachers must set up conspicuous reinforcing contingencies to gain control of the classroom and encourage students timeliness and    cooperation.
              1. Teachers should make sure to provide positive reinforcement for effort in attendance
                 a)Cannot continue using rewards indefinitely.
                   (1)	Guide child to come under the control of the instructional material instead of reinforcements.
                 b)Children attend school to learn behaviors that will pay off naturally later in life.
                 c)Learning new tasks is not enjoyable initially.

III. Range of positive reinforcements available for school use.

       A. The effect success has on learning
              1. Educational materials should not be too difficult 

IV. Educational environments should not only reward the top students for achievements and punish those that do not perform well.

       A. Need to allow for individual progress of each student.
              1. Structure lessons in a way that progress can be easily recognized.
       B. Students attempt to avoid consequences.
              1. Find positive consequences to replace aversive techniques.
                 a)Restructure classrooms and negative techniques
                 b)Change to positive reinforcers.
                 c)Positive reinforcers are better motivators.  
                   (1)	Offering rewards initially helps to induce natural rewards. 
                 d)Negative reinforcers can contribute to learning.
                   (1)	There are variable results of averse control.
                   (2)	The system is opposed to improvements.

V. Problems of transition from negative to positive reinforcer

       A. Relatively easy transitions can be made.
              1. Offer attention to those practicing desired positive behaviors.
       B. Educators should rely more on reading.
       C. Much of our thinking is verbal 
              1. Decreased reading results in decrease thinking 
              2. Should emphasize verbal reasoning
                 a)People enjoy reading and pleasure.

Skinner on Education

Behavioral objectives are key elements of the learning process according to B.F. Skinner.  Human behavior is controlled by operant responses that rely on reinforcement contingencies.  Skinner maintained that people are under the control of the physical environment, however, when a greater dependency on the educator rather than the physical world is developed, educators must assist in decreasing and shifting this dependence.  The less dependent a child is on the educator, the more advanced the child will become.  Skinner theorized that although students may develop a greater dependence on reinforcements from the educator, people generally are equally as dependent on the physical environment.  The learning process becomes more ineffective when dependent students are under the control of personal approval.  Educators should however set up conspicuous reinforcing contingencies to gain control of the classroom and to encourage students’ timeliness ad cooperation.  “Schools set strict rules about the types of student behavior that are unacceptable and assign rather severe consequences for students who do not abide by the rules. When the initial policies prove ineffective, schools often respond by “getting tougher.” That is, they invest in other security (e.g., metal detectors) and punitive measures (e.g., “zero tolerance” policies that result in expulsion) that actually have little impact on student behavior (Negron, et al., 2008).  This reinforces Skinner’s theory that education systems ultimately are defective and need major revision based on empirical evidence to produce the optimum environment for learning.  To achieve this learning environment teachers should provide positive reinforcement for effort in attendance, behavior and academic achievement, as well as effort, as though to help bridge the gap between high achievers and students that typically have had poor performance.  Educational environments should not only reward top students and punish those that do not perform well.  Positive reinforcement allows for individual progress of each student.  However, reinforcement by the educator should not be used indefinitely.  This practice will shift dependence back onto the educator.  Using positive reinforcements in the initial stages of learning, then gradually decreasing responses, will guide a child to become under the control of the instructional material, thus creating a dependence on the educational environment and natural rewards.


References: Skinner, B.F. 1950. Are theories of learning necessary. Psychological Review, 57, 193-216.

Skinner, B.F. 1938. The behavior of organisms. New York: D. Appleton-Century Co.

Skinner, B.F. 1968. The technology of teaching. New York: Meredith Corporation.

Throne, J. M. (1972). Skinner throws down the gauntlet. Professional Psychology, 3(4), 398. doi:10.1037/h0020751