Jump to content

Talk:Pornography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 63.167.159.217 (talk) at 18:28, 2 August 2006 (Ted Bundy interview?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Talk:Pornography/Archive1 Talk:Pornography/Archive2

"Child pornography is illegal in almost all countries"

Almost? Where is it legal?-Neural 22:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Russia did not, as of 2002, have specific laws prohibiting child porn though this may have since changed. Some countries do not prohibit the possession of child porn, only it's production or sale, so the above sentence is misleading should be made clearer. --Cab88 14:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"In Israel" removal

Why remove it from the first picture subtitle? Some of those pr0ns even contain something written in that weird writing of the Jews. 201.23.64.2 04:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pornography in Singapore

"Singapore: Illegal, including softcore publications such as Playboy. Legal to view over Internet but illegal to download it. "

That's the exact same thing. Mace 07:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that it is legal so long as you do not copy the pornography onto your hard drive with the intention of watching it later.
I removed the contradictory statement and replaced it with more accurate info a the legal status of net porn in Singapore. I could not find any info on whether their was a exception under the law for just looking at porn sites (content only temporarily saved in web browser cache) as apposed to actually permanently saving internet porn to one's hard drive (outside of the cache). --Cab88 22:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External Links?

In the external links there is an Advocacy section; why isn't there a Critical section?

Ted Bundy interview?

Why was the link to Ted Bundy's last interview removed from the sociology section? The bulk of the interview was on the topic of pornographic material.

No reason given; it's going back up.