Talk:70/20/10 model (learning and development)

Business Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Markup broken. This page is unreadable as it stands. Liam Proven (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

== I would like to know which company had use this model, beside google and dell

Salient Criticism

I think this article needs a look at the relevant criticisms levied at the "70-20-10" hypothesis in order to make the article more neutral and scientifically sound. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bs?

Zxv ewxcv i would like to know if there is any substance to this model. do companies actually track the time for each project and make sure it's the right 70/20/10 distribution?

This might help answer your question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.116.254.200 (talk) 06:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does look as if it is an idea with no coherent evidence. The article should be marked for deletion.

Fustbariclation (talk) 00:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is very much measurable - please see: https://www.702010forum.com/Posts/view/measuring-the-impact-of-70-20-10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.151.229.28 (talk) 06:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Major sections of this read like marketing material for the 70 20 10 forum. I would like to see more citations and the removal of the "Strategy" section. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 21:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]