Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Toronto Earth Sciences/Thinking About Planet Earth (Spring)
Appearance
This Course
|
Wikipedia Resources
|
Connect
Questions? Ask us:
contactwikiedu.org |
This course page is an automatically-updated version of the main course page at dashboard.wikiedu.org. Please do not edit this page directly; any changes will be overwritten the next time the main course page gets updated. |
- Course name
- Thinking About Planet Earth
- Institution
- University of Toronto Earth Sciences
- Instructor
- James Mungall
- Wikipedia Expert
- Ian (Wiki Ed)
- Subject
- Mass Extinctions
- Course dates
- 2016-01-04 – 2016-04-08
- Approximate number of student editors
- 21
Seminar course devoted to explorations of the Earth Sciences for first year Arts and Sciences students.
Student | Assigned | Reviewing |
---|---|---|
Wellyiding | ||
XBC199AZ | ||
AliciaCKY | ||
Sandra.lee97 | ||
Allisonmb | ||
Deepikha101 | ||
Si Wen Cheng | ||
Wenzhao Jiang | ||
HMohamud97 | ||
Jcjwang | ||
BolindazheShi | ||
Lilyyhlu | ||
Oliviavb | ||
Tanyastojovic | ||
Miadaks | ||
Camper37 | ||
AliceKXZ |
Timeline
Week 1
- Course meetings
-
- Wednesday, 13 January 2016
- In class - Wikipedia essentials
- Overview of the course
- Introduction to how Wikipedia will be used in the course
- Understanding Wikipedia as a community, we'll discuss its expectations and etiquette.
Handout: Editing Wikipedia
- Assignment - Learn the basics
- Complete the online training for students. During this training, you will make edits in a sandbox and learn the basic rules of Wikipedia.
Week 2
- Course meetings
-
- Wednesday, 20 January 2016
- Assignment - Critique an article
- Review pages 4-7 of the Evaluating Wikipedia brochure. This will give you a good, brief overview of what to look for in other articles, and what other people will look for in your own.
- Evaluate an existing Wikipedia article related to the class, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's talk page.
- A few questions to consider (don't feel limited to these):
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Do a literature review and compile a list of possible references or sources for future additions to the article
Resources: Evaluating Wikipedia, Using Talk Pages
Week 3
- Course meetings
-
- Wednesday, 27 January 2016
- Assignment - Add to an article
- Add 5 to 10 sentences of new information, backed up with appropriate citations to appropriate sources, to the portion of the Wikipedia article that you critiqued in February
Week 4
- Course meetings
-
- Wednesday, 3 February 2016