Talk:Black Sea campaigns (1941–1944)

Military history: Maritime / Balkan / European / German / Russian & Soviet / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Bulgaria

This page claims Bulgaria participated in naval warfare in the Black Sea in World War Two, but does not mention any actual Bulgarian forces or individuals. This is problematic. Additionally, if I recall correctly, Bulgaria did not send troops to the Eastern Front but rather only deployed forces in the Balkans against Greece and Yugoslav partisans. If that is true, why would the Bulgarian Navy engage in naval conflicts in the Black Sea? On the Bulgarian WWII page it is mentioned that the Soviets attacked some Bulgarian coastal merchant shipping and that the Bulgarian navy engaged in some skirmishing as a response to protect its shipping, but that is not cited and nothing more of the Bulgarian navy is mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.206.188 (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have editted the Bulgarian navy sector. Many of the previous figures were clearly wrong, such as including 1 destroyer and the submarines which were not part of Bulgarian navy during ww2, but rather transferred to them post-war by Soviet Union. The data on light forces were also not precise, such as the combination of torpedo boats and motor torpedo boats, which were two different types of naval vessels.128.250.0.215 (talk) 04:21, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP edits

I'm curious if this is one and the same editor

K.e.coffman (talk) 21:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm curious why you fail to see reason. Can you please, for a second, stop asking who I am, but what I actually do? What's your beef with Regina Maria? There is no longer excess of Romanian warships, so why you can't let her have her merits? Also, why you cannot understand that Moskva is more notable than Kommuna? She's a battleship, yeah, but did next to nothing! Moskva fought and ended up as the worst csualty of the war. "Rv to prior", yeah, that's the easiest way isn't it? Ok, "Rv to prior", but why? Seriously, why? 79.113.133.11 (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]