Talk:Peace at Home Council
![]() | Turkey Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Military history Stub‑class ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Rename
I think the article should be renamed. Because "Turkish Peace Council" is not the exact translation for the Junta's original Turkish name "Yurtta Sulh Konseyi". "Council for Peace in Home" or "Homeland Peace Council" would be more appropriate.
Existence of subject not yet RS'd
The BBC source cited doesn't give detailed claims of the Turkish Peace Council really existing, it only refers to a verbal TV statement by an unnamed person, uses lower case "peace council", and gives no further details. The Guardian article Indymedia-type live feed attributes aims to "Armed forces", not to "Turkish Peace Council". So this article is a bit premature - a merge and redirect to 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt would probably be justified until there are sufficient details to start a proper WP:stub. Boud (talk) 23:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC) Minor correction. Boud (talk) 23:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
turkish-language version - names of would-be members?
tr:Yurtta Sulh Konseyi has a list of red links that look like names: "Muharrem Köse, Mehmet Oğuz Akkuş, Erkan Ağın ve Doğan Uysal". The source appears to be: http://t24.com.tr/haber/aa-darbeyi-planlayan-albay-muharrem-kose,350193 Someone who knows turkish might wish to help... Boud (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Don't delete it
The article says it has been nominated for deletion. IMO this shouldn't go ahead. This coup will likely change the entirety of the Turkish government and geopolitics in the region. While it could use expanding, it shouldn't be deleted. PromethiumElemental (talk) 12:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)PromethiumElemental
-yeah why should it be deleted its? The article would lack an other side it makes absolutely no sense--Crossswords (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
What is here that is not covered in the main article? Hollth (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)