Jump to content

Talk:University of Illinois System

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thesquire (talk | contribs) at 22:17, 10 September 2006 (→‎The Chief: cite your sources). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconIllinois Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I'm going to delete the redirects of the individual campus links. They deserve individual articles, like the UCs. --Jiang 22:25, 2 Oct 2003 (UTC)

This article should be at University of Illinois System. University of Illinois should be about the school in Urbana-Champaign. john k 00:35, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The University of Illinois is a system. The Chicago campus information is bare.User:chriscarlos

  • If you feel strongly about this, then move it. I've minor misgivings about doing so and won't do it myself but won't act adversely if the move occurs. Chief among my misgivings is that when I've mentioned "I went to the University of Illinois" its about 50:50 whether I'm asked if it was the Chicago campus or not. Typically when I've wanted to be clear I use the semi-official "University of Illinois at Champaign/Urbana" versus "University of Illinois at Chicago" (the other campuses never seem to come up in conversation .. I'm not even sure what they are). So my thinking is that this page should not be moved but that pages with the aforementioned names be created and material moved to them if, in fact, there is enough material to warrant a split at this time. Of course, the more technically correct version would be to move this to "University of Illinois System" and leave "University of Illinois" as a redirect to that .. I think that would be the best of the solutions. Courtland 23:42, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • I would have to agree with Courtland's opinion. The University of Illinois is not just one campus, so having this page redirect to the Urbana-Champaign page would not be appropriate. Thesquire 04:32, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I also agree with the opinion that it shouldn't be used. People here (UIUC) do talk about ourselves as "Illinois" and "The U of I", but "UIUC" is equally common, and if someone asked me what school I attended I would not answer "The University of Illinois", I would more likely say UIUC. Agriculture 06:20, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree that it should be moved. Three or four times, I've come across mentions of "university of Illinois" in articles, and it has always meant to refer to the Urbana campus but is redirected to the system article. The Chicago and Springfield campuses are not nearly as involved in research, etc. as Champaign is, and I have never seen a mention of either of those two campuses anywhere. The article "University of Illinois" should refer to the Champaign campus.

So that's all?!? CERTAINLY NOT!!!

Is there not any controversy on campus? Do we not have issues with our mascot? Do we not make lots of engineers which help create weapons of mass destruction as well as ones that are researching hydrogen technology? I feel our 'knowledge' about the university which we present ourselves to the world is limited and must be improved! (Note the above comment is from 69.214.224.60)

User at IP:69.214.224.60, POV additions are not part of what Wikipedia is about, take your political diatribe elsewhere. Agriculture 20:26, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cushing Vandal?

There has been a persistent vandal over the past few weeks that has twice now removed the Tim Cushing entry under Notable Alumni, and also blanked the entire Cushing page. I have no clue who Cushing is, but the fact that his individual entry was vandalized both times says these edits were abusive. Just something to keep an eye out for. eaolson 15:42, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is also a persistant vandal, 68.77.29.155, who likes to blank large sections of text and replace it with all-caps lines like "OWNED" and references to bodily functions. Checking the page frequently to keep him from altering the page terribly much would not be out of line. Thesquire 13:07, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As a note, this vandal has recently started posting under 68.77.159.55. Thesquire 18:36, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, there is a large section of text missing from the UIUC section of the article. Was this removed for a reason, or should it be considered yet another instance of vandalism and be restored? Thesquire 13:07, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
That segment got lost a few edits ago, when someone cleaned up after the vandal. It's back now. eaolson 18:07, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]


The Chief

I do not know many details on this, but as of now, the chief is gone. -Masterkilla

He's not gone, unfortunately. Please see the Chief Illiniwek article for more information. Oh, and please sign your posts properly with four tildes (~~~~). -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 23:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

</nowiki>

I'm pretty sure he is, I read the article on the Daily Illini (U of I newspaper) a week or so ago. Thanks for the tip on signing my writings. The Grim Reaper 22:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He's not, the BoT has done nothing in response to the NCAA's ban - what you were reading about in the Daily Illini was merely the effects of the ban on the Tennis team. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 22:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If he was not gone before, he is gone now. An unnamed university official has confirmed that Chief Illiniwek will be dropped after the end of this academic year. Chiwara 21:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Recent statements by the university say that they have not made any decisions yet - as noted in the Chief Illiniwek article. Until you can cite your sources, you can't back it up, so your claim won't go in the article. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 22:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]