User talk:Gerry1214

I'm gone forever because of a block by User:Bbb23. Instead of blocking the user who severely insulted me and who was edit-warring and removing reputable sources, I was blocked despite acting according to WP:BLPREMOVE and though I had very good arguments on the talk page of Frauke Petry. Though I saw some bad decisions, this is the worst decision I have ever seen in WP history (and I read a few years). So write and improve your articles without me. WP is a dead project for braindead people.--Gerry1214 (talk) 20:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just one more thing to add: I am NOT and have nothing to do with User:Guyfire 5, who awarded me a barnstar. Whoever claims that should perform a Checkuser, immediately! Or revert his own action on my user page, which was NOT allowed!!! Also the user, who was obviously blocked just on suspicion, should be unblocked. What a ridiculous theater.--Gerry1214 (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw that the Guy(fire) ;) maybe was involved in sock-puppetry otherwise. I don't know who he is and what he did, but he is right with what he wrote in the barnstar-box. So that has to be restored immediately.--Gerry1214 (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To share some of my final thoughts with maybe some unknown readers; after writing and improving hundreds of articles you are slapped in the face by some people instead of saying 'thank you'. Also on Talk:Frauke Petry the personal attacks and propaganda against me and the will to label a person ignoring majority sources continue, backed by a blocking admin. So I finally learn to know the true nature of Wikipedia. I'm happy to say that it will never reach me personally, I am just a little (not too much, I'm on this planet a little longer) astonished what I find behind the friendly masks.--Gerry1214 (talk) 18:39, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your barnstar:

Just an FYI; it was probably removed on the grounds that Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a block, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule.. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. If it is so, than the action was very much ambigous; the edit comment "rv sock" could be and was interpreted by other users, as if it was my sock, who added the barnstar, not the sock of an other user.--Gerry1214 (talk) 12:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice attack

Hi. I just posted a direct question for you, on Talk:2016 Nice attack#Article on list/categories ‘Terrorism’; Infobox wikilinked on 'Vehicular assault as a terrorist tactic'. --Corriebertus (talk) 06:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again I posted, today 15:13, a direct question to you (under your 'answer'), because you did not fully answer my previous question yet. --Corriebertus (talk) 15:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gerry1214. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Strobl EU-Bund-Land- Innenminister Jahr 2016

"CDU-Vize Strobl provoziert mit Abschiebeforderung" Zitat FAZ Online 28 November 2016.

Der provoziert nicht der bagatellisiert, unterschätzt, unwissende!.
Wie ist die Lage in Deutschland November 2016?
Nun aus den Anreinerstaaten des Mittelmeeres und aus aller Welt sind viele Menschen in Deutschland, die kann man, wenn man sie in Deutschland nicht töten will, nur in die gesamte deutsche Hochseeflotte durch Geheimdienst, Polizei, Militär an irgend einen Platz bringen, wo sie die nächsten 100 Jahre nicht weg können oder sie werden dort getötet. Es geht um Millionen Menschen! 194.69.15.68 (talk) 17:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Keep calm. How can I help you?--Gerry1214 (talk) 20:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	for your initiative in creating new articles E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, and let me add that I equally appreciate your commitment.--Gerry1214 (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your threat

I have been around at Wikipedia since 2004, and this was the first time someone warned me like you did in your last revison comment - just out of the blue. In the main-stream media in my country the current version of that article is described as non-true "russian propaganda". I do not consider your contributions to that article as a neutral point-of-view. I notice that you have an interest in describing suspected crimes made in Germany specificly by refugees and assylum seakers. 176.10.249.111 (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't "warn" you. I just referred to the previous discussion. A more content-related answer can be found on the talk page. I notice that you maybe have other "interests" than me, which is ok. Different users, different "interests". ;) But in fact I'm mainly interested to give a complete picture of what happened based on the best available sources. I hope this is also your intent. --Gerry1214 (talk) 18:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]