User talk:Wafulz

Archives

Talk:Wafulz/Archive 1: June 2006 – August 2006

Zeph

The modifications I made are no more or less neutral that your right-wing boosterism. Will you at least remove any association of "Right-Wing" with the label "Christian". There is no single view of "Christian" values, and to assert that the right-wing is identified with a non-existant concept is meaningless. Further it is offensive to many Chritians. It is more correct to use the terms "pseudo-Christian" or "Christianist" as I have attempted to do in my edits. If you cannot accept this then please drop the reference altogether.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.186.87 (talk • contribs)

The fact of the matter remains that with the right wing, especially in the United States, Canada and some European countries, many of the values held are indeed Christian-based. There's little exaggeration in claiming that Christianity is often associated with stances such as Intelligent Design, pro-life, and traditional marriage. I am a Christian and I realize that these beliefs don't hold true for every one of us, but we're often associated with them. --Wafulz 01:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bennett Madison

Is it okay if I put the expected book back in the Bennett Madison article? He sent me an email saying that it is being written. loulou 14:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. loulou 15:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for your assistance. The Coffee Shop That Smiles Upon The River 15:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too Bad

He seemed like a nice guy. I just saw the thing and voted, I was unaware of any such rules, but it's not a big deal, i'm new around here and just poking my nose around in everything. I'm on AOL most of the time, so we must have shared an IP somehow. The Coffee Shop That Smiles Upon The River 15:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious. How is my name similiar to his? The Coffee Shop That Smiles Upon The River 15:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roger

I received a mesage that you'd changed my 'test' edit to the article on Prof richard Holmes. It wasn't a 'test' - I'm confused as to why you decided it was!

My correction was that Prof Holmes was 'promoted Colonel' not 'promoted to..' as you had written. Army officers are not 'promoted to' - my usage is correct, yours is wrong. When writing about a distinguished officer (my ex-CO) and historian it's important to get it right.

Please reinstate my correction — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.67.126.86 (talk • contribs)

Thanks - 3 pedant points to me :)

??

Audrey Hepburn WAS born Andrey Kathleen Ruston. She changed her name later on. It was not a test. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.22.212 (talk • contribs)

It says pretty clearly on her birth certificate (which is provided) that this is not the case. --Wafulz 02:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

InsideHoops

I responded on the talk page, because you think I'm vandalizing a page, when I'm really trying to protect it, that's all.— Preceding unsigned comment added by XxNeXuSxX (talk • contribs)

I don't care

You Wikipedia guys really annoy me. You're horrid snobs. You're threatening me with a block now? Wow aren't you a big man. --Jiei 04:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You specifically called all of us Americans (despite the fact many of us were from Europe, Canada, and the UK, such as yourself) and furthermore saying that all Americans are prejudiced. You were incivil, and I told you to stop- had I made those comments, I would be getting the same treatment. --Wafulz 04:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

message from 84.13.4.185

I'ma editing you because i don't know how to talk to you any other way. And I think you're rather mean. And you're just gonna say I'm vandalising again. And Bleh bleh bleh. Shall I wait 'til you're sleeping? :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.4.185 (talk • contribs)

It's funny because nobody likes you. ^_^— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.4.185 (talk • contribs)

Please vote on this discussion

I see you are quite an active editor. I have been debating with another editor whether or not my company qualifies under WP:CORP We feel that it does under the first point. The other editor keeps bringing up things that are not in the rules outlined under WP:CORP Please comment on this discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Enigma_software_group

thank you,
EnigmaSoftwareGroup