Talk:Mattress (rocket)

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / British / Canadian / European / North America / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	World War II task force

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Mattress

This whole section seems uselessly vague. Which Allied nation developed this? What year? What was the official model designation? What is the origin of the "mattress" name?

I also find it highly suspicious that a single rocket launch system of early design could possibly fire 800 to 1000 rockets in 45 seconds since the crew would probably be sheltered some distance away from the firing blast and could not do any reloading manually, while rockets by nature have no recoil to function any automatic reloading mechanism. Did one launch system consist of 1000 launch tubes?