Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ShinySquire
ShinySquire
- ShinySquire (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
14 April 2017
– This SPI case is open.
Suspected sockpuppets
- AnonEditor18923 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- RonaldWilliam (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ProudCalifornian (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Heavy focus on Brittany Pettibone, mixed in with gnomish wikilinks, just like previous socks. Grayfell (talk) 03:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
AnonEditor18923 is open about being an alt of RonaldWilliam [1] Grayfell (talk) 03:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I'm the same person with multiple accounts, most of my accounts are throwaway accounts. I often use accounts to offer privacy on contentious subjects, and it was never my intention to be deceptive. From my understanding of the policy on multiple accounts, it is perfectly allowed as long as you do not abuse it. If I somehow violated the rules on it, it was never my intention, all of my edits have been constructive and with the purpose of improving the articles within.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Legitimate_uses
AnonEditor18923 (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)