Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ShinySquire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnonEditor18923 (talk | contribs) at 03:46, 14 April 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

ShinySquire

ShinySquire (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed


14 April 2017

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

Heavy focus on Brittany Pettibone, mixed in with gnomish wikilinks, just like previous socks. Grayfell (talk) 03:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AnonEditor18923 is open about being an alt of RonaldWilliam [1] Grayfell (talk) 03:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I'm the same person with multiple accounts, with most of my accounts are throwaway accounts. I use multiple accounts to hide my IP from public view, due to editing on a contentious subject, and it was never my intention to be deceptive. From my understanding of the policy on multiple accounts, my actions are perfectly allowed.

If I somehow violated a rule on it, it was never my intention. Reading my edits to the Wiki, you can see that all of my edits have been constructive and with the purpose of improving the articles within. I never have any malicious intent, and followed Wikipedia guidelines on sock puppets and multiple accounts; all of my edits are constructive. On the other note, before today, I didn't know how to respond to accusations, so I'll freely admit that is my fault. I'm currently setting a perm account, which is named CuriousDetector.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Legitimate_uses


AnonEditor18923 (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments