Jump to content

Talk:Folktronica

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Artykmbandmaster (talk | contribs) at 19:58, 18 June 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMusic/Music genres task force Stub‑class
WikiProject iconFolktronica is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Replaced Deek Hoi after he was deleted by an anonymous user with no explanation. Please see my discussion under Psych Folk for notation. Thanks! Martillie 1:10, 17 May 2006

Divided list into two columns

--Papertrail 08:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I forked the article to Wikinfo

They allow SPOV and OR, so you might be able to expand the list, and in time, make this article good enough for reproduction. Just saying.70.54.181.70 (talk) 20:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

@Artykmbandmaster: Please read WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH and WP:TONE. If you want to add information to the article, not only does it need to be presented in a formal tone, but it has to be supported by a reliable source (see WP:RS for what constitutes a reliable source) --Ilovetopaint (talk) 15:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ilovetopaint: Please read WP entry for Electric Folk to see just how much information on a particular genre can be included without having to resort to post 2000 web factoids. you are excluding alot of electronic folk artists from this space by constantly deleting references. Just grow up Artykmbandmaster (talk) 19:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC) artykmbandmaster[reply]

For example: the statement "the capital of France is Paris" needs no source, because no one is likely to object to it and we know that sources exist for it. The statement is attributable, even if not attributed.