Jump to content

User talk:Chenzw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Edgarjstephens (talk | contribs) at 06:51, 26 June 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Smile!

Hello Chenzw, Filper01 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

01:13:39, 11 November 2016 review of submission by FToast



Why was this article declined? It does have "independent, reliable, published sources" that are required, including CNN, Boston.com and several other news outlets. Thank you for your re-consideration

17:49:14, 15 November 2016 review of submission by 50.252.6.193



We would like to know what/how the tone of the article should be changed. To our understanding, all the frills have been taken out and we have left the barebone facts on the page. Any suggestions you can offer on what needs to be changed would be helpful.

22 November 2016 review of submission by MayKacharava


Hi Chenzw,

Thank you for you time. I am new here and to my disappointment my article was declined. Although I tried to write it according to Wikipedia rules. Articles is written from a neutral point of view. The sources used are completely independent. You suggested to add more reliable sources. I did it after reading Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. But I am afraid that I still don't understand why my sources are not reliable. Could you, please, clarify for me what's wrong with them. And perhaps now when I have added one it would be enough.

Please, help!

Best, May

11:47:33, 21 November 2016 review of submission by PriyankaD



Hi Chenzw,

Acording to your suggestions, we have added reliable references in the Rohan Lifescapes draft.

07:18:29, 23 November 2016 review of submission by Jaybee2205


I've made the article more neutral and removed sections where I only had the organization's own website as a source. I still kept the website as a source, but only for facts that I could also verify from an independent source - sometimes there was a few more details on the Vientiane Rescue page, however, so I thought it would also be useful to refer to that. Please let me know what you think.

12:07:50, 25 November 2016 review of submission by PriyankaD



Hi Chenzw,

As per your suggestions, we have added some more reliable references that suits the wikipedia's criteria in the Rohan Lifescapes draft. Request you to please check and provide your feedback on the same.

Hope to hear soon from you on this.

Some Help

Hi Chenzw,

I am a new user and this was my first page! I've tried to remove any unverifiable sources but am still having problems getting it confirmed.

I wonder would you have any insights or advice, I really want to learn how to do this well.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KellyClar93 (talk • contribs) 09:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:51:04, 26 June 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Edgarjstephens


Hi Chenzw, I have followed the guidelines for my article. The sources of information are definitely reliable and verifiable. It would be great if you could point out which part of the draft doesn't have notable sources, if any.

Looking forward to your reply,

Thanks, Edgar Edgarjstephens (talk) 06:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chenzw&oldid=787582582"