User talk:TPTB
The Powers That Be
Incident notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Gikü (talk) 21:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Fake information
Why do you suport and protect the fake infomation on this page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSA_Steaua_Bucure%C8%99ti_(football) ?
Is wikipedia just o tool to deceive people? AntonescuFCSB47 (talk) 09:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
All the information on that particular page is true. If you're going to accuse me of lying, please also offer some evidence to support your claim. - TPTB (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
It seams that I can't post links, so enter UEFA's site (be it UCL or UEL) and have a look where the history is. That team from Liga IV isn't organised as the ex champion of europe (1986) by any national or international federation (FRF, LPF or UEFA).
The lawsuit between CSA and FCSB is only about the brand, not the trophies, not the history and surely not about the sport identity.
1. The court's decision was only for the brand 2. All the Football Federations recognize FCSB as Steaua's successor 3. The majority of people know that FCSB is the real FC Steaua. I mean there are only 2000-3000 people from the ex Steaua ULTRAS who betrayed the team for personal interests VS millions of people who support the team from Liga 1.
So Legal, Social and by the Football federations, FCSB is the ex-FC Steaua!
PS: What really happened! In the comunist era, each fotbal team was owned be a minister, company or a state force. FC Steaua was owned by the army (Ministry of Defence). This is something that I think you know already.
But in 1998 the Army gave the fotbal team up to a non-profit association because of UEFA rule implementations (no departmental team was allowed in the European competitions). Then by 2003 the team collected many depths and was nearly declared bankrupt by the court. But in 2003 the team was reorganized as an action based society, Becali bought the majority of the stock and become the owner of the team. There is nothing illegal with that!
So the page has so much bull**** information......
AntonescuFCSB47 (talk) 12:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- The decision of a judicial court trumps something posted on a website. So far, UEFA has not issued a press release saying that it actually recognizes FC Fcsb as Steaua Bucharest. The fact that you use the name FC Steaua shows to me that you have no idea about anything whatsoever. The team FC Steaua never actually existed. The team who won the Uefa Champions League in 1986 was called CSA Steaua Bucharest - TPTB (talk) 13:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
AHA it is clear for me now, Never trust this begging for money site with untrained and lazy admins/ editors.
I really consider you a stupid person. I said already that the court's decision was only for the brand Doesn't matter even if this deceiving page exists, people will still know that the real Steaua is in LIGA 1!
AntonescuFCSB47 (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)