Talk:BMC Control-M

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 August 2017. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Redirect‑class Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect Deletion

This redirect should be deleted because it is appearing in Google results for phrase "Control-M" but the redirect target page has no content about the subject. Wattssw (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deletion

The BMC Control-M page was successfully removed using Proposed Deletion. It has since been reinstated for no given reason. I will now be using the Articles for Deletion method for proposing deletion Wattssw (talk) 12:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

This article reads like it was written for or copied from advertising. --72.12.218.72 (talk) 14:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most of this article was written by BMC customers (such as myself) who enjoy talking about how much we enjoy the product and want to share information with others. -- Robertstinnett (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- still - it shoul'd 'read' as an encyclopedia article, not marketing material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.219.233.199 (talk) 09:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree that some parts (especially the "Agentless Job Scheduling" section) read as advertising. You can simply mention/describe the features without resorting to marketing jargon to make them look sensational. Apapadop (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No way control-m can be enjoyed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.80.164.36 (talk) 08:57, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The links referring to the Gartner Reports are no longer valid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.134.183.208 (talk) 17:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this reads like advertising copy - curious why it hasn't been flagged as such by the normally-vigilant Wiki Admins? 142.205.241.254 (talk) 18:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The link 'BMC Control-M Info and Documents' (http://www.learn-ctm.com/) doesn't work.Hilfsarbeiter (talk) 15:47, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]