User talk:Syong Lee
Sockpuppet investigation
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Finley22 Waterman, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Quinton Feldberg (talk) 22:33, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Can I remove this? Or will you report me for that?? XD --Syong Lee (talk) 02:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
Thanks for the tips.
- You may want to check out WP:BURDEN before you dig yourself deeper. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- I understand the claim here, however the user is not challenging any particular source or content but removing a whole random packet of content. This way what the user considers bad content gets removed but also everything else. The whole issue here is that the user reverted without a discussion.--Syong Lee (talk) 03:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Anachronist: this is a WP:DUCK of User:Finley22 Waterman Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:28, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- I understand the claim here, however the user is not challenging any particular source or content but removing a whole random packet of content. This way what the user considers bad content gets removed but also everything else. The whole issue here is that the user reverted without a discussion.--Syong Lee (talk) 03:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- You may want to check out WP:BURDEN before you dig yourself deeper. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Please consider all of the removed content individually. Many removed items are sufficiently sourced and will be lost.--Syong Lee (talk) 03:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)