Jump to content

User talk:Jbarta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 212.88.36.183 (talk) at 11:08, 28 October 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user has made little to no edits outside the topic of longevity, despite topic banning professionals in the field in 2014/2015 for that exact reason. He has no idea how the topic of longevity is managed, he engages in original research despite Wikipedia's policy saying no original research, he hates the GRG and will do anything to bring them down, he is The Doctor from the 110 club who was originally trusted but later revealed to be a spy. I am exposing this user because he is anti-longevity and anti-GRG, he has helped to make Wikipedia useless for information on longevity. The Gerontology Wiki is a million times better! LONG LIVE THE GERONTOLOGY WIKI! LET'S EXPOSE WIKIPEDIA'S ANTI-LONGEVITY BULLIES!

No regards, Wikipedia hater.

Farewell, wherever you are

Jbarta was one of the more respectable editors of Wikipedia, in my opinion, and his departure is a sad loss to the project. It would seem that the bullshit which a lot of us have to put up with here may have put him off completely in the end. I no longer frequent the Photography Workshop for much the same reason. Even more frustratingly, the proverbial BO that he refers to on his user page remains as pungent as ever.

If you're reading this, JB, I'd like you to know that your presence is missed. I've archived your talk page and placed the banner atop this page out of respect. And I sincerely hope that you're still alive and kicking, and have simply found things to spend your time on that you find more rewarding.

All the best, nagualdesign 00:58, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WilloughbySouthRebel.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WilloughbySouthRebel.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]