User:68.113.163.239/sandbox

"Article Evaluation"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_disfluency

-The use of the term(s) repaired utterances really stood out to me as accurate word choice. It proves credibility.

-It only defined it. The article says it's universal. But that's so general. What about American culture for example, and the use of disfluencies within it.

- The author uses hyperlinks to define other words that are covered by other Wikipedia articles. There are no other credible sources like scholarly journals, speeches, scholars, or more that are mentioned as reference or evidence.

- There is so much more to disfluencies than its definition. I want to better express it.