Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Snle

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser‎ | Case

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Disambiguation (talk | contribs) at 16:57, 21 October 2006 (→‎Snle 6?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Snle 6?

I would like to have User:Disambiguation checked against Pezh and Snle. His edit patterns are similar to Snle's sock puppets and he made a completely unwarranted disambiguation without much prior discussion, which earned him a temporary block. If you look at Talk:Manchuria it seems that this user has been making edits both to the main page and the talk page under different user accounts.--Niohe 15:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's nonsense. There has been nobody suggesting create a disambig page for Manchuria so far. I don't think there is a need to have a dicussion, even though I'm discussing it. There is a policy to follow. Disambiguation 16:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
to the OP: request needs a code letter. ~crazytales56297 O rly? Ya rly! 16:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is so ridiculous. How can someone has so many infinitely blocked sock puppet? And there are new socks coming? Disambiguation 16:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Christ. Hu Jintao (talk · contribs), Jacob Zhang (talk · contribs) didn't even edit anything. How can they be socks? Disambiguation 16:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe most of these socks are innocent. Otherwise it is just too ridiculous. These users should be unblocked. Disambiguation 16:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Snle}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Snle 5

See below for more information.--Niohe 03:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snle 4

It seems that the blocked User:Snle has opened a new account. Please see discussion below for more details.--Niohe 21:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: I have indefinitely blocked Wang Bin (talk · contribs) as Snle's sockpuppet as it seemed rather obvious in [1] and [2]. If checkuser provides a contrasting result, please unblock ASAP. Thanks --Srikeit (Talk | Email) 04:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've added User:Shenyang, due to the similar editing pattern. Also, this edit matches Snle's long-time obsession with historical names in Chinese city articles (the policy violation is ban evasion). —Khoikhoi 19:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed both, and also Wang Xin (talk · contribs), Nres (talk · contribs), Xin Wang (talk · contribs), Mark Wang (talk · contribs), Zhou Enlai (talk · contribs), Hu Jintao (talk · contribs), Jacob Zhang (talk · contribs), Ethan Wu (talk · contribs), Wu Qingfeng (talk · contribs), Zhjng (talk · contribs), and several others that are already blocked, like QingGong (talk · contribs), Mahs (talk · contribs), and Outu (talk · contribs). Note the overlap with Edipedia. Perhaps they're the same person; I don't know much about that case. Dmcdevit·t 19:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snle 3

It seems that Snle has kept a different account active, which he/she is now using to reinsert by the User:13569 edits, which Khoikhoi deleted yesterday. Judging by the contributions, User:Manzhouri is nothing but a sock-puppet of Snle.--Niohe 18:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


 Clerk note: Please provide diffs and the code letter from the list at the top of the base page so that the checkuser that looks at your request may fully understand the nature of it. Thank you. Kevin_b_er 19:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well Snle was recently indef. blocked for sockpuppetry (see below). Yesterday one of his sockpuppets, 13569, was confirmed by checkuser. Because of this, I deleted his comments on the talk pages of the articles that Snle edited: Dalian, Harbin, and Shenyang. Today Manzhouri reverts me by re-adding 13569's comments on two of thee talk pages. Also note here where Manzhouri replaced 13569's sig with his. I am almost positive that Manzhouri is another one of Snle's many sockpuppets, used to evade his ban (the behavior is almost identical). —Khoikhoi 20:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If I were an admin, I'd be blocking. Reclaiming a confirmed sockpuppet's comments as your own. Try finding an administrator (WP:ANI or WP:SSP too) who's willing to block based upon this. Will probably be faster than waiting for a checkuser. Kevin_b_er 20:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. I'll do just that. —Khoikhoi 20:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Dmcdevit·t 22:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snle 2

After Snle's sockpuppetry (below) was proven, he was was indefinately blocked. His (rather obvious) sockpuppet has returned to continue the discussion on all three articles he edited: Harbin, Dalian, and Shenyang. The user exhibits a virtually identical pattern of behavior to that of Snle's previous sockpuppets, and I have no doubts that he is evading his ban. —Khoikhoi 00:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Also likely, 56352 (talk · contribs). Dmcdevit·t 02:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snle

  • Code letter: E

Revert of recovered common names of cities, e.g., in Dalian article:

  1. 18:49, 30 September 2006 Zhang Qiang
  2. 21:57, 30 September 2006 Zhang Qiang
  3. 00:38, 1 October 2006 Zhang Qiang
  4. 21:01, 1 October 2006 Snle
  5. 21:21, 1 October 2006 Snle
  6. 21:26, 1 October 2006 Snle
  7. 00:35, 2 October 2006 918

Two relatively new accounts engaged in revert war deleting historical names from Dalian, Harbin and Shenyang. Both of them have similar pattern, including misleading edit summaries. `'mikka (t) 17:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: 918 has now started to revert as well. —Khoikhoi 20:39, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: it was actually User:九·一八事变, see e.g., [3] The number 918 popped up probably because en-wiki soft cannot process non-English names properly (and the account was actually blocked for this reason). But I may be mistaken. `'mikka (t) 17:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
 Additional information needed Code letter and links/diffs as appropriate. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. `'mikka (t) 02:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Zhang Qiang and Snle in which light the remaining ones may be obvious. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked them all indef Jaranda wat's sup 22:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Snle&oldid=82836540"