User talk:ZfJames

This is ZfJames's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This user is in college.

This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time.
Although he may occasionally be able to do some editing, messages left for him may not be replied to for a while.
He will be back on Wikipedia when college is over.

Since I work against vandalism, some of the information contained here may be objectionable. Read with discretion.

Darius robin

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at iPhone X, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Darius robin (talk) 13:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your first few edits were vandalism. Your last edit was not. Please understand the time at which I give you the warning, and stop searching the warning templates page for random warnings. Darius robin (talk) 14:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Darius robin:I am neither searching Wikipedia for random warnings nor am I vandalizing pages. Please either explain how my edits were vandalism or stop trying to create conflicts. Your removal of my content was indeed a violation of Wikipedia's requirement to assume good faith.

These two edits (1 and 2) clearly portray vandalism, one of them adds false information and the other removes content without reason. Please stop accusing others of violating Wikipedia rules without you following them yourself. Darius robin (talk) 14:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Darius robin: What false information was added specifically? What content was removed without a reason? Are you disputing my edit summaries? If so, I will gladly update my edit summaries to reflect the changes, but I need specific examples of the false information added. Venator 14:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this and this. If you can't figure out what you did wrong, you're stupid. THANK YOU. Darius robin (talk) 14:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Darius Robin and New Editors

I believe that it is rather excessive to put a level 4 vandalism warning on a (relatively) new editor's page after several good faith edits. While it is certainly appropriate to avoid vandalism, this type of action seems to be a direct violation of both the assumption of good faith (WP:AGF) and the general guideline to not bite newcomers (WP:BITE). Since Darius' note was on my talk page, I did want to take the time to clarify this point, but I do not have any desire to rekindle this minor 'war.'

HIV denialism

Hello. Let me quote user "Ian.thomson", from a thread in the HIV denialism Talk page: "Some denialists assume that AIDS is a consequence of anal sex". This is why I edited the article and wrote "(precisely, anal sex)". It's not random sexual behavior that denialists point to, but specifically anal sex, as opposed to vaginal sex. My edit was in complete good faith and not intended to vandalise the article. I'm surprised as to why you gave me such a warning and made this accusation. I wish this edit could find it's way back into the article. I see that my second edit was left in. Was it because I pointed to a source? If that's the case, I might be able to understand why the "anal sex" addition seemed to violate any rule. 190.173.207.99 (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC) Ezequiel[reply]

Fixed Well, I see what you are saying. I was perhaps a bit hasty to mark that particular edit as vandalism, but I would still leave it out of the header just because it is a detail which really belongs in the content. According to the article, that belief is confined to North America, so it would be a detail in the article, not necessarily a fact included in the broad introduction. Other than that, I will put a message on your talk page clarifying that your edit was indeed a good-faith edit and letting you know of this comment. Thank you for letting me know! zfJames (talk) 00:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Banned from editing on Nicktoons UK?

Why don't I STUFF YOUR FACE IN?!?! 217.42.129.40 (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have not 'banned you from editing' as you claim in the header. Please avoid personal attacks since nothing on Wikipedia is worth fighting for at that level. Thanks! zfJames (chat page) 17:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalism!

I just added the names of Donald Trump Jr.'s five children! What's wrong?? Marie.margaretha (talk) 18:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that these edits appear to be in violation of the specific request on the page to not add the children's names. However, I agree with you that your edits were not vandalism and that I was incorrect in my assessment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZfJames (talk • contribs) 11:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't vandalism but it was a BLP violation and edit warring. Marie.margaretha, please obtain consensus at Talk:Donald Trump Jr. before reinstating. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]