Jump to content

Monster of Ravenna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nemoscis (talk | contribs) at 17:32, 2 May 2018 (Changed "possibly apocryphal" to "apocryphal." Apocryphal means something is said to be true yet still of a dubious nature, therefore it possibly apocryphal is redundant. At the very least it means possibly possibly fake, which is really a double negative meaning possibly real, but if something is possibly real, it's also possibly fake, as well as possibly possibly fake, thus possibly need not be included.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Monster of Ravenna as depicted in Curious Creatures, John Ashton, 1890.

The Monster of Ravenna was an apocryphal late Renaissance-era monstrous birth whose appearance in early 1512 near the city of Ravenna was widely reported in contemporary European pamphlets and diaries. Images of its grotesque features were symbolically interpreted by opponents of both the Catholic Church and the Protestant Reformation, although a more common explanation at the time held that the beast was an omen regarding the outcome of the Battle of Ravenna. Modern medical consensus identifies the monster as a child with some variety of severe congenital disorder.

History

The earliest account of the monster's existence comes from the diarist Sebastiano di Branca Tedallini, who recorded on March 8 that news of a strange infant's birth had reached Pope Julius II in Rome. According to his account, the child was said to have been born of a nun and a friar, and was marked by a horned head, the letters YXV on its chest, and with one leg hairy and cloven-hoofed while the other leg's midsection grew a human eye.[1] On March 11, the apothecary Luca Landucci documented how word of this incident had reached Florence; having apparently received a drawing of the monster, Landucci described it to possess features such as a single horn, the wings of a bat, hermaphroditic genitalia, an eye on its right knee and a clawed left foot like an eagle's.[2][3][4] The tale was subsequently immortalized by further chroniclers of the era, including Johannes Multivallis, Jacques Rueff, Conrad Lycosthenes, Caspar Hedio, Pierre Boaistuau, Fortunio Liceti, and Ambroise Paré.[5] Landucci's physical description appears to have been considered authoritative, as later chroniclers, particularly Boaistuau, largely reproduced his account word-for-word.[6][a]

It was common practice for malformed infants, especially those with a low chance of survival in medieval Europe, to be abandoned and left to die by starvation;[7] this was swiftly carried out in Ravenna on the order of the Pope.[4]

Even after its reported death, however, news of the monstrous birth continued to sweep Europe, often in stories greatly embellished by the storyteller. In a popular poem given by Marcello Palonio relatively soon after its birth, the monster is oddly implied to possess two heads.[8][9] With more time, the appearance of the Ravenna monster rapidly evolved, changing its number of legs from two to one and eventually syncretizing with the morality figure of Frau Welt.[4][10] Giovanni Battista Bissoni was contracted to design the illustrations to the second edition of Fortunio Liceti's account, with the Monster of Ravenna centrally displayed on the frontispiece; by this point, the creature was well-established as possessing a single clawed foot.[11]

A major element in the popularity of the "monster" was its appearance alongside similar signs and portents; the occurrence of other preternatural events was a key factor in convincing Landucci that this was not an isolated incident.[12] In 1514, with the example of Ravenna still fresh in public memory, a so-called "Monster of Bologna" was reported. This child was born with two faces, three eyes, and a woman's vulva on its forehead. It lived long enough to be baptized as "Maria" but died four days later.[13][14]

Interpretation

The horn [indicates] pride; the wings, mental frivolity and inconstancy; the lack of arms, a lack of good works; the raptor's foot, rapaciousness, usury, and every sort of avarice; the eye on the knee, a mental orientation solely toward earthly things; the double sex, sodomy. And on account of these vices, Italy is shattered by the sufferings of war, which the King of France has not accomplished by his own power, but only as the scourge of God.

— Johannes Multivallis, Eusebii Caesariensis episcopi chronicon, 1512[15]

Contemporary accounts sought to explain the "monster" and its unusual features in religious terms. The version proposed by Multivallis was fairly typical of the age; the recent Battle of Ravenna was a common theme in most texts produced very soon after the initial incident, being mentioned in both Landucci's report[3] and that of Ambroise Paré, who tersely listed the Monster of Ravenna as an "Example of the Wrath of God" upon Pope Julius II and the people of Italy.[16] Others focused on the specific vice of sexual immorality, as Pietro Martire d'Anghiera recorded the belief that the monster was born the illegitimate child of a married mother.[17]

During the Protestant Reformation, monstrous births and similar incidents were cited with political aim, most notably in the example of Luther's mooncalf. In the fifth volume of the anti-Lutheran Centvrien by Johann Nas, Martin Luther is himself identified with the Monster of Ravenna.[18] On the Protestant side, early woodcuts were produced which depicted the child as having been born in a Florentine convent, the offspring of a nun and the Pope himself. This was followed by the more established narrative that the birth presaged the invasion of Louis XII as an agent of God's displeasure with Catholic power.[19]

Speculation on origins

Analyzing the later account of Ambroise Paré, Walton et al. proposed a tentative diagnosis of sirenomelia with related factors;[b] additionally, they highlight possible indicators of hydrocephalus causing a bulging anterior fontanelle, radial hypoplasia with pterygium to give the impression of wings, and caudal regression, the latter of which may have been caused by diabetes mellitus in the mother.[20] The "horned" forehead can alternatively be viewed as an instance of cyclopia.[21] Finally, it is plausible that some of the more striking features were caused by Roberts syndrome, which could have affected the development of the limbs and genitals.[4]

References

Notes

  1. ^ Boaistuau's account includes the description of the eye on the knee and the clawed foot, but he has combined the two into a single leg. The text is otherwise nearly identical to Landucci.
  2. ^ This is based on Paré's assertion that the child had only one leg, per the later accounts of the Monster's appearance.

Citations

  1. ^ Niccoli 1990, p. 35.
  2. ^ Niccoli 1990, p. 36.
  3. ^ a b Daston & Park 1998, p. 177.
  4. ^ a b c d Leroi 2003, intro.
  5. ^ Huet 2004, p. 131.
  6. ^ Hampton 2004, pp. 179–180.
  7. ^ Niccoli 1990, p. 33.
  8. ^ Niccoli 1990, pp. 40–41.
  9. ^ Ashton 1890, pp. 173–174.
  10. ^ Niccoli 1990, pp. 37–44.
  11. ^ Cheng 2012, p. 212.
  12. ^ Daston & Park 1998, p. 178.
  13. ^ Bowd 1999, p. 41.
  14. ^ Niccoli 1990, pp. 52–53.
  15. ^ Daston & Park 1998, pp. 181–182.
  16. ^ Paré 1982, p. 6.
  17. ^ Niccoli 1990, p. 47.
  18. ^ Spinks 2009, p. 343.
  19. ^ Schutte 1985, p. 92.
  20. ^ Walton, Fineman & Walton 1993, p. 12.
  21. ^ Martínez‐Frías 1994, p. 362.

Sources

Books

  • Ashton, John (1890). Curious creatures in zoology; with 130 illus. throughout the text. London: John C. Nimmo. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.32031. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Hampton, Timothy (2004). "Signs of Monstrosity: The Rhetoric of Description and the Limits of Allegory in Rabelais and Montaigne". In Knoppers, Laura Lunger; Landes, Joan B. (eds.). Monstrous Bodies/Political Monstrosities in Early Modern Europe. Cornell University Press. pp. 179–199. ISBN 0-8014-4176-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Articles

  • Bowd, Stephen D. (March 1999). "Pietro Bembo and the 'monster' of Bologna (1514)". Renaissance Studies. 13 (1): 40–54. JSTOR 24412789. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Schutte, Anne Jacobson (Spring 1985). "'Such Monstrous Births': A Neglected Aspect of the Antinomian Controversy". Renaissance Quarterly. 38 (1): 85–106. doi:10.2307/2861332. JSTOR 2861332. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monster_of_Ravenna&oldid=839318594"