Jump to content

User talk:PlyrStar93

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zdrmonster120 (talk | contribs) at 02:54, 11 May 2018 (→‎for that change you did to bittorrent that undid mine?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Free Speech, NOT

Free speech exist for the things you don't agree with. Stick to your 000s and 1111s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.144.94.27 (talkcontribs) 19:49, 1 Feb 2018 (UTC)

Humorless

You have no sense of humor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.69.163 (talk) 00:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry guys my friend was just messing about sorry hope you dont mind :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasagi all the way (talkcontribs) 04:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TO:PlyrStar93

Hello, PlyrStar93 just asking is there any oxygen in Brine Pools? Kind Regard-Hasagi all the way <3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasagi all the way (talkcontribs) 04:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Sorry everyone I am new to Wikipedia so please understand that i might struggle sometimes. Thank you Kind Regards Hasagi all the way<3 Hasagi all the way (talk) 04:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Da Fuq

Bro I am using very informational information. The last thing I want is you telling me what to do. The government is up to everything, So chill, — Preceding unsigned comment added by MommasBoy97 (talkcontribs) 20:26, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Information iconGenerally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports.Template:Z182 Beeblebrox (talk) 18:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do acknowledge, however, that this was an unusual case in that their global userpage which was displaying here was problematic. That being said, blocking them here wouldn’t have changed that. I brought this up over at Meta, where the userpage was generated and someone added a handy piece of code to their page that makes it not display on other projects, so basically they are Meta’s problem now. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

for that change you did to bittorrent that undid mine?

i just want to change common to famous