User:Beetlebailey335/sandbox
Article evaluation
I read the article about upcycling. They did a good job on staying on point and only saying facts, they didn't throw random stuff into their article and they didn't share any opinions. Checked a couple of their sources and some of the links were to articles that aren't around any more so they just went to a dead page. There are also a lot of sources with no link so you can't be redirected to the page. There is a bit, but not a lot, of talking going on in this page. It is a C rated article so there is definitely room for improvement. The article is part of the wiki environmental project, and part of the industrial design project.
This is a user sandbox of Beetlebailey335. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
= PEER REVIEW
Hi there. I was going over your assigned article after reading your evaluation. Right after the description of 'Upcycling' there is an indent with a paragraph that seems to be a long quote. I am a little confused about where that quote is from and why it is placed right there at the top. Also, is the quote a bit too long for Wikipedia? I feel like one of the tutorials said something about using quotes or lengthy quotes. I just question whether that should be there or not. Colenyj (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)