Article evaluation

I read the article about upcycling. They did a good job on staying on point and only saying facts, they didn't throw random stuff into their article and they didn't share any opinions. Checked a couple of their sources and some of the links were to articles that aren't around any more so they just went to a dead page. There are also a lot of sources with no link so you can't be redirected to the page. There is a bit, but not a lot, of talking going on in this page. It is a C rated article so there is definitely room for improvement. The article is part of the wiki environmental project, and part of the industrial design project.

This is a user sandbox of Beetlebailey335. You can use it for testing or practicing edits.
This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course.
To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section.

Get Help

PEER REVIEW

Hi there. I was going over your assigned article after reading your evaluation. Right after the description of 'Upcycling' there is an indent with a paragraph that seems to be a long quote. I am a little confused about where that quote is from and why it is placed right there at the top. Also, is the quote a bit too long for Wikipedia? I feel like one of the tutorials said something about using quotes or lengthy quotes. I just question whether that should be there or not. Colenyj (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)