Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slashdot history

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ShaneKing (talk | contribs) at 23:42, 15 December 2004 (→‎[[Slashdot history]]: keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Slashdot history

Delete: All these Slashdot subarticles should be kept under the main Slashdot article. It's just one website.

  • Nah. Leave it. Nothing wrong with it. --Spe88 07:23, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep this was listed by a anonymous user who is trying to blank every Slashdot page, but this may as well get a hearing on here Estel (talk) 08:50, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. utcursch 10:52, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
  • Weak merge and delete. &#0xfeff;--fvw* 11:29, 2004 Dec 15 (UTC)
  • I disagree with merging all Slashdot articles together. The separation is necessary since e.g. the article on trolling phenomena is extremely detailed, and that detail would be too distracting in an overview article. However, this one is quite short and history is pretty much always of fundamental importance to a topic. For that reason, I think this should be merged with the main article. Ideally, the content should also be changed into prose, but that will of course only happen if someone wants to do it. Fredrik | talk 13:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep: lots of edits - it's obviously being looked after. If that's how the people maintaining the slashdot article want to organise it then let them. Seems silly to force them to merge it all back in. And why delete?--Tomheaton 14:02, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, agree with Tomheaton -- Ferkelparade π 15:25, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, obviously. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 15:45, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Although I think it should be moved to History of Slashdot. [[User:David Johnson|David Johnson [T|C]]] 17:32, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep as it is. Wyss 19:05, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Was this an anonymous listing? Who nominated this? Vandalism or not, this VfD should be removed. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 19:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • I am removing this anonymous VfD submission by User:198.97.67.56 as it was unfounded to begin with. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 21:22, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, anons can't submit things for vfd, so no need to even consider the merits. Shane King 23:42, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)