Jump to content

Relational dialectics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Erachima (talk | contribs) at 03:14, 31 October 2006 (reverting to me. Please readd that content in a prose format, like an article, rather than a big list.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.
Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion.

Steps to list an article for deletion: {{subst:afd}} • Preloaded debate OR {{subst:afd2|pg=Relational dialectics|cat=|text=}} • {{subst:afd3|pg=Relational dialectics}} log

Relational dialectics is a concept within communication theory. The theory, originated by L.A. Baxter in 1988, defines long-term conflict patterns between individuals as the result of endemic dialectical tensions. These tensions are a result of the conflicting emotional needs felt by the participants of any relationship, and as the balance between conflicting needs shifts within the relationship, the relational dialectic will also shift. According to the dialectic model, there are 3 core tensions in any relationship:

  • Privacy vs. transparency: By the sharing of information, a relationship can grow closer and stronger. However, this need for self-disclosure conflicts with the need for privacy felt by each individual in the relationship. When these needs are at odds with one another, a relational tension is created over how much disclosure is desirable.
  • Novelty vs. predictability: For a relationship to be maintainable, there is a need for structure and stability. At the same time, a relationship in which nothing out of the ordinary takes place cannot stay dynamic. The struggle to avoid monotony while maintaining order is the basis for this tension.
  • Independance vs. consolidation: All humans have a need for autonomy and independance. Conversely, they wish to attach themselves to others through relationships, in which decisions are made on a group level. Tension arises here when attachment to the group encroaches on the individual members's need for self-government.

In order to maintain a healthy relationship, the members must strive to reach an acceptable happy medium between these desires and needs.

References

Ronald B. Adler (2004). Looking Out, Looking In (11th edition). Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN 0534636284. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

This article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Relational_dialectics&oldid=84763526"