User talk:PlyrStar93
Feel free to leave me a message, but please be advised that:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Free Speech, NOT
Free speech exist for the things you don't agree with. Stick to your 000s and 1111s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.144.94.27 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 1 Feb 2018 (UTC)
WP:UAA reports on users with no edits
Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.
For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports.Template:Z182 Beeblebrox (talk) 18:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- I do acknowledge, however, that this was an unusual case in that their global userpage which was displaying here was problematic. That being said, blocking them here wouldn’t have changed that. I brought this up over at Meta, where the userpage was generated and someone added a handy piece of code to their page that makes it not display on other projects, so basically they are Meta’s problem now. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
for that change you did to bittorrent that undid mine?
i just want to change common to famous — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zdrmonster120 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The No Spam Barnstar |
Thank You Thank You for reporting those vandals and spammers. I’ve seen you do it today and I present to you this. Keep up the good work and Happy Wiki. ARMcgrath (talk) 03:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
great admin!
You're great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.178.96.208 (talk) 05:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 05:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
any valid way to press a button (5 days)
- HMRaya_5 is yet another 'playing' with the predictable items that Manda 1993 was blocked for... JarrahTree 12:26, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- @JarrahTree: Global locks would hopefully be timely on this (although it still can get quite backlogged as well). Actually found another account from suwiki. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 13:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. cheers JarrahTree 13:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- @JarrahTree: Global locks would hopefully be timely on this (although it still can get quite backlogged as well). Actually found another account from suwiki. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 13:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thanks, was just experimenting and did not know about the sandboxUselessbay2000 (talk) 01:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)