Talk:Travis CI

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 June 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

FOSS, really ?

The page lead says that Travis is FOSS. However, it is said to be undeployable and the on-premises version involves licence keys. Probably there are parts missing from the source on github.

Is there a source for the claim that Travis is FOSS ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.13.197.229 (talk) 13:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are there really parts missing from the GitHub source?

I don't think it's a requirement that FOSS needs to work! If the Travis GitHub source should (hypothetically) require licence keys and not include such keys, then provided that a programmer can remove the test for those keys and thus make it work I think it would still count as FOSS. Bizarre perhaps, maybe not very helpful, but I think it would still fall within FOSS. Viam Ferream^Talk 13:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The linked repository (https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-core) is now marked as DEPRECATED and has been archived on GitHub. I can find a variety of MIT-licensed components in their GitHub organization, but I'm unable to assess whether the whole of the Travis service is open-source. At the very least, the reference should be updated. --Remram44 (talk) 22:39, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Name origin

I've been unable to find a reference on where the name "Travis" comes from, does anyone know? It's sort of a strange name and perhaps there's a story. Kenahoo (talk) 03:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nodejs usage

The references don't seem to back this up, and Nodejs actually use Jenkins (now). https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/4026/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.88.161 (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]