User talk:LadyMargo

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, LadyMargo. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Dan653 (talk) 00:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia operates on civil discussion

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Vladimir Lenin. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Go read their User pages and you will see that they are anti-Semites and then go look at the paragraph I'm editing, which is clearly written to present his Jewish ethnicity to be certain when that it is in question and with his main ethnicities presented as being in question when they are certain! They are reverting my edits because they are anti-Semites and they do not like the fact that I present the facts accurately!

I did not attack anyone. Statements of facts are not attacks. A person who murders is a murderer. A person who hates Jews is an anti-Semite. Nor do exclamation marks mean that I am not calm! Take your false accusations and leave my Talk page!

"Personal attack" has a non-physical meaning. If you insult or slander someone, that's a personal attack.

You need to read WP:Assume good faith, WP:CIVIL, and WP:No personal attacks. If you are not willing to abide by those rules, you need to find a different website to use. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you daft? And you claim to be an English major? Ha-ha. Again, I did not insult or slander anyone. A person who murders is a murderer. A person who hates Jews is an anti-Semite. Learn the difference between insults and statements of facts.

Last chance to agree with WP:CIVIL. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not civil? Are you serious? You are the one who is not civil. You made false accusations about me and where told to leave my Talk page yet you kept posting on it. Again, go learn the difference between slander and statements of facts. Hope your degree taught you reading comprehension. Good day/night!

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:36, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm giving you some time to think about how everything you've been saying so far could be perceived as uncivil, without letting editing distract you. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LadyMargo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21639 was submitted on May 26, 2018 01:42:21. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Age of marriage in the United States

Please discuss any proposed changes on talk, and do not engage in an edit war. The new changes contradicted the sources cited in the article; the text was unencyclopedic, and it misrepresented the source. An article cannot be altered so dramatically without WP:CONSENSUS reached on talk page. 2A02:2F01:53FF:FFFF:0:0:6465:42DD (talk)