User talk:Cyphoidbomb

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Notice!

Dear admin please take notice that an user Ganguly mm or so has been changing some part of the plot section of Kusum dola article to a version that is to say the exact copy of the plot as per blocked user sunit roy's last edit on 3rd august. I feel that it is quite evident that after being blocked sunit roy is using this parallel account headed by the production company i guess. Also from the search history i saw that this account has been used to make edits on kusum dola majorwly. Please look into the matter. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.233.62.193 (talk • contribs) 16:17, August 8, 2018 (UTC)

User cyphoid bomb

It would be appreciated that you edit articles alone,or you can blame for any mistake commited..But unecessarily dont ENTER in my own talk page.... you block the people or users if something goes wrong Is it right to edit my talk page and call MR.aussie legend for serious discussion. I just want to say the page you edit ,seriously think aboutit bcoz hindi language people will not appreciate these stuff and its flop tv stuff,not even consider any single minute for that show.Ithought that i remake DDrajasthan dishayen which atleast be useful for13 -23 year old people.BUT i dont think so this will not work out.and please im not bothered you are working 20years ago before stuff 2001.coming to present DONT EDIT MY talk page.--Padmakalki (talk) 09:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC) I will show the fact tommorrow only 1/10 know about this show..very sorry you create articles for small things.BUT you pple will never pffer opportunity to the kinds who are really admiring.if you have time watch my youtube links given before4 days that u reverted...im have not created web series,its about the show that you need not know But remember atleast if you have some interest dishayen (DD)rajasthan is amazing..But dishayen dd 2001 is alone your aim of research.continue research ur flop stuff --Padmakalki (talk) 09:24, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Padmakalki, but this is funny. Talk pages are open to anyone to complain in or talk to you. If you do not understand this, you should start by reading the Wikipedia policies before commenting. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 05:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Query

Methinks your friend with whom you have been "conversing" above should be placed on administrative leave based on WP:NOTHERE or WP:COI, or some combination thereof. It's your call, though I realize you shouldn't do the job yourself. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:04, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shock Brigade Harvester Boris: Well... I don't see the COI issues, but their English comprehension skills worry me. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:23, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gack, I meant WP:CIR, not WP:COI. Getting a bit careless with my WP:ALPHABETSOUP. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dishayen article

I got your reply ,if you can please rectify that partSameer kills Neha's and Nikita's cousin over a dispute, and Rajive gets framed.that line is incorrect.The story is soniya,neha cousin gets killed when she tries to kill neha in rage.neha tries to defend herself But accidently sonia gets stabbed herself by mistake.she dies through injuries.Rajeev meets soniya before her death so he and neha are framed.But in court rajeev as wellas neha are questioned. Atlast through nikitha request sameer reluctantly helps neha & rajeev in soniya murder case,.This part has to be correctedthere is no proof/link,but this is the actual story part --Manavatha (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Manavatha: I've deleted the content, because the details you've provided just open up more questions for me, and I'm not clear on how these events affect the larger series arc. I think it's better to omit this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Me Too movement (India)

There was only one main article, Me too movement until October 11, 2018. Metoo tag began surfacing in India only a couple of weeks ago and suddenly a large article has been created. Indians always has a thing for controversies and they just want a space to stuff all the daily news coverage in their own POV. Also most of the issues written in that article is not happened under the "metoo campaign". In Malayalam, as far as I know only one actress has reported misconduct (that too not under metoo, but media relates it for hits), yet there's a separate section dedicated to the industry (I have trimmed it substantially). The overall NPOV is highly challengeable and one sided. India has the least metoo reports and there's a section for India in main article like any other country, don't know what's so special about India. This article is unnecessary and should be deleted. 2405:204:D20D:E712:C1A5:F07C:A5A9:6CA6 (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can't delete it just because someone doesn't like it. I am not clear about whether or not this is an article about Me Too in India, or an article about sexual harassment in Indian cinema. It just seems that unless the complainants are vocalising their stories with #metoo hashtags or unless they're saying that they stood up because they were inspired by the Me Too movement, we'd just have an umbrella article to collect all sexual harassment claims made over the years. I don't know. Anyway, your options as I see them are:

Propose deletion through Articles for Deletion. You will need to present a compelling case for why this should be deleted.
Propose a merge of this article with Me too movement, if you think that's where it belongs. Merges are a little tricky, you'll have to read the instructions, because you have to template both the target and the origin pages, and open a discussion on the destination page. Again, you'll need to write up a clear argument for why the two should be brought together, and since there's a lot of content on the Mee too India page, you'd have to help figure out what to move over and what to dump.
Don't delete or merge, but instead, help shape it away from whatever POV or other issues you're seeing.

Whatever you choose, you might also consider inviting members of WikiProject India and WikiProject Feminism to the discussions. Hope that helps, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:50, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to address this to both of you. I have already posted a more detailed response on the original poster's talk page, but I will paraphrase here. First, I admit there have been some users who just use the article to post the latest 'happening' of harassment allegations. But for the most part, many of the incidents listed are consequential and have had social impacts, and are not just allegations. For example, Anirban Blah was asked to resign from one of the top management firms in the country; Sajid Khan was outed as director of his film, MJ Akbar was asked to leave politics and is now taking his accusers to court, etc. These are all very socially relevant things and that happened fairly quickly. And I think it's quite biased of you to say that Indians always have a thing for controversy, as if we are incapable of being objective. There is little on that page that is actually one-sided, because most of it came from major news sources - so they are meant to be objective. And also, you're saying that it's just Indians writing their own 'daily news coverage': this movement has been deemed significant enough to be written about by BOTH the US' Financial Times AND CNN:

https://www.ft.com/content/4b3c4e7a-d2cf-11e8-a9f2-7574db66bcd5

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/10/asia/india-metoo-intl/index.html

Another thing, a major gripe you had was that it just came about a couple of weeks ago and so it shouldn't have its own article on that accord. Keep in mind that according to WP:PERSISTENCE: "That an event occurred recently does not in itself make it non-notable." Yes it only happened a month ago, BUT it has been in the news CONSISTENTLY during that time, and has reached news of not only all across India but into the US as well (WP:GEOSCOPE) (WP:DEPTH). So it covers a lot of bases as far as having its own article. I don't think you are justified in saying it doesn't.

Rush922 (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOL

The "conversation" a few sections above is comedic gold. I've rarely been this entertained on Wikipedia. :D Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...that's true! :D Csgir (talk) 08:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism by IP

2401:4900:1802:BDB6:EDBC:7DA2:FD66:8C86 has repeatedly been adding age related pronouns to cast sections for upcoming Indian films. Most don’t make sense, just because the actor is old doesn’t mean the characters are old. Summaries like “Some editors are very obsessed with making old actors look young” don’t make any sense. Reported it here now. 2.51.21.238 (talk) 10:24, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the IP is now using 27.60.179.100. 2.51.21.238 (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked the IPs and protected a couple of those articles, including Zero and Thugs of Hindustan. So weird. No idea what this person's obsession is with aging and youth, but those adjectives sound like they are material to the characters' experiences in their story, which hasn't been established. Is Shah Rukh Khan playing an "aging" dwarf in Zero? Is the age of the character a material plot point, or is this person just trolling Shah Rukh Khan by calling him old? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you tell SummerPhDv2.0 to leave me alone

Hi, I'm trying to do my best editing here on wikipedia, and all I get is SummerPhDv2.0 reverting all of my edits. I have learnt my lesson that I must provide a reliable source when editing but I'm just getting sick and tired of SummerPhDv2.0 reverting all of my edits. Please can you tell SummerPhDv2.0 to leave me alone because I'm already starting to get stressed of SummerPhDv2.0. Kind regards. 82.19.95.171 15:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you evading an existing block? If so, that would be a violation of our sockpuppetry policy. If you are evading a block, any edit you make can be reverted without regard for its utility. So my advice to you is to get your block squared away. It looks like Summer has mentioned this to you on your talk page numerous times. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know but I'm already beginning to get very tired and stressed about it, I'm only trying to do my best editing as possible but SummerPhDv2.0 really does make me very angry, I am sorry it has come to this but I cant take anymore of SummerPhDv2.0's reverting. 82.19.95.171 15:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe some time off will help you get your stress under control. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Ali Khan

Hi admin, this page is created and as far as i know, the actress has not even debuted yet in any Production. In your this edit [1] you redirected but it has been created once again. Just wanted to asked you she meets notability now? Regards KironKhanna (talk) 11:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]