User talk:Alex Cohn
Hi! Welcome to my talk page. Please remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~) so I know who you are. Thanks!
| This is Alex Cohn's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
I am VERY upset with you good sir
I have taken the initiative to research Sir John Fogerty thoroughly and I've cited my source. This man was absolutely born in the bayou and I can prove it! In his own words Fogerty mentions being "born on the bayou", he "remembers the fourth of july" as well and I did not see that in the documentation. I will take you to court and I will prevail over you.
He was born on da bayou
Cordially yours, Whatever — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.84.176.5 (talk) 06:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Alex Cohn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Alex Cohn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
error in changes
hi alex,
i believe you made an error about your changes to my most recent edit on wikipeida about wedding videograhpy. I am an expert in videography and im just citing an article i found about same day edits. if you read the page, there are three other links:
http://www.nhimages.com/blog/bid/36879/Cinematic-vs-Documentary-Wedding-Videography http://www.livepicturestudios.com/cinema/2012/01/11/what-is-the-difference-between-cinematic-weddings-vs-traditional-weddings/ http://brighterlightsmedia.com/short-form-wedding-films-3-key-questions/
the link i was adding is https://sdeweddings.com/things-consider-getting-day-edit-wedding-toronto/
the link I was adding has more relevant information about the topic and is lot more insightful about the topic. if anything the other three links are more spammy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yangwyang (talk • contribs) 04:45, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yangwyang, please review Wikipedia's policy on External links. In particular, please try to avoid linking to commercial sites or sites with an obvious conflict of interest. Additionally, do not add external links to the body of articles, as you did here. Thank you. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 19:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
"Edit War"
I have attempted to resolve the dispute on the Talk page for nearly two years now. However, I am continuously either ignored or silenced. I assume that "WWGB" and his cronies have also been issued an "edit war" warning? And for his blatant removal of my Talk page comments (which happens to be your suggestion)? I have requested edit protection, and nothing has been done. Whether or not you like President Trump, his OFFICIAL medical exam lists his height as 6'3". I claimed his height to be 6'3", based on reliable sources, for a full year BEFORE the OFFICIAL medical exam was conducted and published. Now I have been factually vindicated, yet anti-Trump trolls persist in vandalizing the article, with fake news conspiracy theories, claiming his OFFICIAL White House physician "lied" about Trump's height. It's all absolutely absurd. I will continue to edit Trump's height on this article to 6'3", and list the OFFICIAL, credible reference for it, until either the article is removed, Wikipedia shuts down, or I am no longer living. If I am banned on this IP, I will switch to another IP. Do what you will. I really don't care, as it will not stop me. I have been engaged in this "edit war" for literally years now, and have no intention of stopping. Have a good one. 192.254.1.7 (talk) 04:56, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
The Hatian Invasion of DOMINICAN REPUBLIC THE TRUE HISTORY PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO CHANGE.
why is your article of "unification of hispanola" on the main countrys article page? this was never a historical fact and you amongst others who are ANTI DOMINICAN have merged the original article which was clearly "the HATIAN INVASION OF DOMINICAN REPUBLIC" and you have turned something DARK to a light situation of a massacre of thousands of Dominican men women children by the hands of hatian migrants invaders who went to DR under the false pretence to help Dominican people but instead they killed raped and mutalated white hispanics and INVADED the already known country of DR until juan pablo duarte, sanchez and mella decided they had enough of haitis dictatorship for 21 years they fought haiti more then 10 times they kept trying to invade Dominican republic and till this day DR in facing a massive hatian immigration crisis. Please unmerge the two articles and place back the ORIGINAL hatian invasion of dominican republic article back on the country of DR`s main page where it was until someone moved it with the intentions to cover up historical facts.148.101.133.119 (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
why are you not responding ?
why do you respond to other things but you do not resond to my messages to you??[1] Unmerge these articles please. The fact is there was a HATIAN INVASION and thats how its always been.148.101.133.119 (talk) 19:14, 27 November 2018 (UTC)