User talk:172.78.12.200
December 2018
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Beyond My Ken. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. [1] Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- It's called free speech. Deal with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.78.12.200 (talk) 23:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, as Wikipedia is a private website which maintains a terms of service, there is no expectation of unfettered speech here. See WP:Free speech. What calling another editor "an insufferable little cunt" will get you is a block from editing -- but I guess you assume that because you're using an IP instead of your account you're immune from that. Well, you may be right, but, then again, I'm going to know that any IP from the immediate area of Valparaiso, Indiana is likely to be you, so it's still possible the hammer will come down on you at some point. I've been here for 13 years, I'm patient, I can wait. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- I don't give a shit what you know or how long you've been here. You edit with impunity, safe in the knowledge that your edits are secure and carry the official seal of approval from your cucked, liberal admin friends who make sure that they're using your preferred pronouns before slapping you on the wrist and allowing you to carry on. The hammer will come down for sure, once you and the special protected class of editors have finally destroyed the integrity of this project. Or, I should say, the integrity it has left.
- Great, thanks for that, now I know exactly where you're coming from, and that my efforts to keep biased editing from you and people like you is getting on your nerves, which is really excellent news. And you have also confirmed that you are an editor with an account timidly hiding behind IP, so I thank you for that as well. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Don't thank me, thank your administrator human shields. I'm so glad my original comment irked you so much. It's made my night because this kind of engagement does not appear typical of your behavior here, and so we're left with the very obvious truth that you're triggered and trying to fight against what you know to be true. I've spent a few spare minutes perusing your boring edit history (just conflict after conflict after conflict, slight telling off by limp-wristed admin, back to more conflict - rarely ANYTHING positive whatsoever), and what I enjoyed the absolute most was your very obvious jealousy of Justin Knapp. That tiny little edit you independently and voluntarily chose to make was very telling. Wonderful stuff. As for biased editing, how you in particular can say that with a straight face is, how should I say, Beyond My Ken? Which reminds me, I should have used 'pretentious' instead of 'insufferable'. Or as well as, perhaps. My bad.
- BTW, you've used "cunt" and "shit", but don't forget "fuck" (in all its forms) and "piss" and "cocksucker" and "bitch" (although I guess that one's almost acceptable these days) and "crap" (too repetitive of "shit"?).But lets not fight: tell me about yourself, about your upbringing and your home town. How did you do in school, and what were your favorite subjects? Have you always been angry, have you always lashed out at the world? Did you always hold the views you have now, or did you learn them from someone, maybe a person who you thought could fill the emptiness in your soul. Or perhaps a love affair gone wrong poisoned your mind and prompted you to let out the ugliness that was always lying dormant in the back of your mind?Human beings, right? -- we're endlessly fascinating, and we run the gamut from almost angelic to borderline evil.So, look, if you'd like to talk some time, go ahead and shed your IP skin and give honesty a try, I'll be there for you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Do tell me more of your opinions about my interaction with Koavf, I'd be very interested in hearing them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Feigning prudishness now? Climbing up to your high horse? From someone who recently accused another editor or making 'piss-poor' arguments? Some honesty and integrity there. I enjoyed the amateur psycho-analysis, but what would be more interesting I think, and of infinitely more value to you and your personal growth, would be for you to consider why you voraciously make biased edits, pursuing an activist agenda, continually exploiting the platform willingly given to you by 'friendly' admins; while simultaneously pretending that you're fundamentally upholding the sacred tenets of Wikipedia, as an unbiased, trusted resource. That's fascinating human behavior right there. Is it really all knowingly done, as an 'ends justifies the means' activist operation? Or are you and your pervasive ilk deceiving yourselves, your subconscious only dimly aware that what you're doing here is ultimately destructive?
- The interaction with Knapp speaks for itself. That's why I pointed it out. It was your petty, jealous nature in a nutshell, I think. When you're not excising wrong-think from political articles, you're looking for ways to cut down those more successful.
- Friend of yours? Close friend of yours? Extremely close friend of yours? Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- No, I'm not Knapp. He looks to be worse than you, if that's possible - a Christian Communist. Double-whammy authoritarian and anti-individual boot stomping. I would actually think that would give you and him plenty of common ground to tread. Maybe you can get some tips.
- I'll have you know, sir, there is no one worse than me -- Hitler was a choir boy by comparison and Stalin a saint. Why, I'm even worse than Donald Trump! Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:29, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I wouldn't have been quite that harsh. I had you somewhere between Nicolae Ceausescu and Idi Amin. And Hitler was a choirboy. Valuable propaganda experience that he used later on.
- Ah, shucks, I knew that deep down, in your heart of hearts, you really loved me. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Jesus H. Christ, listen to yourself - Do you want to 'fess up, or shall we ferret out your identity through the edits you make from now on? You sound like the fucking Gestapo. Glad to see you were slapped down though. Hopefully the fish will go with the egg that's sliding down your face.
- Oh, dear, our second lover's tiff, and here I thought things were going so well. Enjoy following me around - if you read the articles I edit, you can learn a thing or two. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- That's thoroughly too rich. You follow folks around before they've barely got a big toe in the door, and promise to stick to them like shit to a blanket to see just what they're up to. Yes, I know all about your editing and its official seal of approval.
- Could you send me a copy of the seal, please? I'd like to display it on my user page, or maybe have it made into a badge I could flash. (*) Come to think of it, maybe I should have it tattooed on my forehead -- I think there's room up there between the horns. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- (*) I mean, of course, another badge, along with my Gestapo-issued one. I do wish they'd hurry up with my request for a new rubber truncheon, my last one's almost worn out from beating up right-wing vandals and innocent doe-eyed Wikipedians. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- The way you treat new editors with utter contempt, just because you disagree with their edits, is as good as any 'seal', because it absolutely shows how bold and entitled you feel that you can behave in this way without consequence, and with zero evidence of any wrongdoing.
- Darling, it's wrong to go to bed angry at each other. Let's put aside our differences and get a good night's sleep, shall we? Maybe a back rub would help? Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- The way you treat new editors with utter contempt, just because you disagree with their edits, is as good as any 'seal', because it absolutely shows how bold and entitled you feel that you can behave in this way without consequence, and with zero evidence of any wrongdoing.
- That's thoroughly too rich. You follow folks around before they've barely got a big toe in the door, and promise to stick to them like shit to a blanket to see just what they're up to. Yes, I know all about your editing and its official seal of approval.
- Oh, dear, our second lover's tiff, and here I thought things were going so well. Enjoy following me around - if you read the articles I edit, you can learn a thing or two. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Jesus H. Christ, listen to yourself - Do you want to 'fess up, or shall we ferret out your identity through the edits you make from now on? You sound like the fucking Gestapo. Glad to see you were slapped down though. Hopefully the fish will go with the egg that's sliding down your face.
- Ah, shucks, I knew that deep down, in your heart of hearts, you really loved me. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I wouldn't have been quite that harsh. I had you somewhere between Nicolae Ceausescu and Idi Amin. And Hitler was a choirboy. Valuable propaganda experience that he used later on.
- I'll have you know, sir, there is no one worse than me -- Hitler was a choir boy by comparison and Stalin a saint. Why, I'm even worse than Donald Trump! Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:29, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- No, I'm not Knapp. He looks to be worse than you, if that's possible - a Christian Communist. Double-whammy authoritarian and anti-individual boot stomping. I would actually think that would give you and him plenty of common ground to tread. Maybe you can get some tips.
- Friend of yours? Close friend of yours? Extremely close friend of yours? Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- The interaction with Knapp speaks for itself. That's why I pointed it out. It was your petty, jealous nature in a nutshell, I think. When you're not excising wrong-think from political articles, you're looking for ways to cut down those more successful.
- Feigning prudishness now? Climbing up to your high horse? From someone who recently accused another editor or making 'piss-poor' arguments? Some honesty and integrity there. I enjoyed the amateur psycho-analysis, but what would be more interesting I think, and of infinitely more value to you and your personal growth, would be for you to consider why you voraciously make biased edits, pursuing an activist agenda, continually exploiting the platform willingly given to you by 'friendly' admins; while simultaneously pretending that you're fundamentally upholding the sacred tenets of Wikipedia, as an unbiased, trusted resource. That's fascinating human behavior right there. Is it really all knowingly done, as an 'ends justifies the means' activist operation? Or are you and your pervasive ilk deceiving yourselves, your subconscious only dimly aware that what you're doing here is ultimately destructive?
- Do tell me more of your opinions about my interaction with Koavf, I'd be very interested in hearing them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- BTW, you've used "cunt" and "shit", but don't forget "fuck" (in all its forms) and "piss" and "cocksucker" and "bitch" (although I guess that one's almost acceptable these days) and "crap" (too repetitive of "shit"?).But lets not fight: tell me about yourself, about your upbringing and your home town. How did you do in school, and what were your favorite subjects? Have you always been angry, have you always lashed out at the world? Did you always hold the views you have now, or did you learn them from someone, maybe a person who you thought could fill the emptiness in your soul. Or perhaps a love affair gone wrong poisoned your mind and prompted you to let out the ugliness that was always lying dormant in the back of your mind?Human beings, right? -- we're endlessly fascinating, and we run the gamut from almost angelic to borderline evil.So, look, if you'd like to talk some time, go ahead and shed your IP skin and give honesty a try, I'll be there for you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Don't thank me, thank your administrator human shields. I'm so glad my original comment irked you so much. It's made my night because this kind of engagement does not appear typical of your behavior here, and so we're left with the very obvious truth that you're triggered and trying to fight against what you know to be true. I've spent a few spare minutes perusing your boring edit history (just conflict after conflict after conflict, slight telling off by limp-wristed admin, back to more conflict - rarely ANYTHING positive whatsoever), and what I enjoyed the absolute most was your very obvious jealousy of Justin Knapp. That tiny little edit you independently and voluntarily chose to make was very telling. Wonderful stuff. As for biased editing, how you in particular can say that with a straight face is, how should I say, Beyond My Ken? Which reminds me, I should have used 'pretentious' instead of 'insufferable'. Or as well as, perhaps. My bad.
- Great, thanks for that, now I know exactly where you're coming from, and that my efforts to keep biased editing from you and people like you is getting on your nerves, which is really excellent news. And you have also confirmed that you are an editor with an account timidly hiding behind IP, so I thank you for that as well. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- I don't give a shit what you know or how long you've been here. You edit with impunity, safe in the knowledge that your edits are secure and carry the official seal of approval from your cucked, liberal admin friends who make sure that they're using your preferred pronouns before slapping you on the wrist and allowing you to carry on. The hammer will come down for sure, once you and the special protected class of editors have finally destroyed the integrity of this project. Or, I should say, the integrity it has left.
- No thanks. Save your hands-on sycophancy for your most treasured admins. It wasn't vandalism. It was pertinent and accurate information for anyone visiting your page. Especially for those new to Wikipedia, wondering why they're being harassed by this crazy old guy, and dragged before ANI within micro-seconds of making an edit to a political article.
- Actually, as Wikipedia is a private website which maintains a terms of service, there is no expectation of unfettered speech here. See WP:Free speech. What calling another editor "an insufferable little cunt" will get you is a block from editing -- but I guess you assume that because you're using an IP instead of your account you're immune from that. Well, you may be right, but, then again, I'm going to know that any IP from the immediate area of Valparaiso, Indiana is likely to be you, so it's still possible the hammer will come down on you at some point. I've been here for 13 years, I'm patient, I can wait. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |