Jump to content

User talk:Gladamas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bradleyagin (talk | contribs) at 21:40, 18 December 2018 (→‎clock tower edit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please click here to leave me a new message.

“Peaceful”

Peaceful is a matter of perspective. There is no consensus that the protesters were peaceful or not. Therefore it would be folly to insinuate that there is. All that readers need to know os that they were protesting. Inputting bias into an article is not something that Wikipedia should do. Leave the information ambiguous. 216.53.168.61 (talk) 00:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a false equivalence. Every reliable source says that the protest was peaceful, please stop pushing your Nazi agenda. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 00:56, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable source such as? 216.53.168.61 (talk) 00:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, neutral is saying nothing. Not neutral is saying peacefully or violently. You must recognize neutrality goes both ways. 216.53.168.61 (talk) 01:05, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[1]: "A 32-year-old woman died and at least 19 people were injured Saturday when a car crashed into a crowd of peaceful protesters leaving a "Unite the Right" rally that officials had declared an 'unlawful assembly.'" [2]: "An Ohio man has been charged in connection with driving a car into a group of peaceful counter-protestors during a white nationalist rally on 12 August 2017, killing a 32-year-old woman and injuring at least nineteen others before backing away at top speed and driving off."
WP:NPOV states: "All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." Additionally, WP:NOR says: "Wikipedia does not publish original thought. All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not clearly stated by the sources themselves." I'll add references to the article citing these websites so these policies apply here. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 01:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Source 1 is a statement of the opinion of the authors of the article, Doug Stanglin and Gabe Cavallaro. Source 2 is a statement of the opinion of the author of the article, Brooke Bonkowski.
These articles are not credible. They are not held to any sort of standard outside of what the news organization is willing to publish. To really show my point, where did these journalists get their information from? Where are their sources? 2600:1006:B12C:825E:C911:B537:823B:8CDD (talk) 01:31, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Man that Vandalism Def-con bar is cool!

HurricaneKappa (talk) 03:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HurricaneKappa: Oh, thank you! Check out Template:Vandalism information#Variants and show the gallery to see different versions of that template. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 03:41, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also check out Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit if you want to learn how to help out. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 03:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remove of submarine page to top

I removed the submarine collum to put it on the top so it will follow other EU country page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.136.118.88 (talk) 04:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. In the future, it's a good idea to leave an edit summary to your fellow editors know. Thanks for contributing! –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 21:00, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia 5230

Sorry about those edits on the Nokia 5230 - they were by accident.Theperson50 (talk) 21:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Theperson50: No problem. Feel free to edit constructively in the future. Also, you are free to remove notices from your talk page (they're not vandalism, they're informing you of a problem with one of your contributions) but that won't make the issues they were informing you of disappear. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 21:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I am sorry for blanking the page --144.132.17.55 (talk) 06:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. Edit constructively in the future and you'll have no problem from me. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 07:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, about my new page

This is about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alyssa_Victoria_Hope

What would make the article have a more "neutral" point of view? I tried to present it neutrally. This person is being used as a fundraising tool by activists who conceal her background and I think it is fair that the background of why this person is in prison in the first place was given, since they are casting her as a "political prisoner". Normally maiming a deputy for 15 minutes for fun is not an act of political dissent...

All of the citations in the page and background are legit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottinfukie (talk • contribs) 06:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Scottinfukie: That draft looks neutral to me; I would add a {{Infobox person}} template if I were you. The reason I reverted this edit is because studies have shown systemic differences between how black and white people are treated in the criminal justice system in the U.S., when controlling for other factors. Thus, adding "purported" would give undue weight to one point of view. I have no problem with the neutrality of your edits as long as you follow the WP:NPOV policy, as it seems (to me) you have done for that draft. Feel free to talk to me if you have any other questions or concerns. (Sidenote: you should sign your talk page messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks) –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 07:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if I'm doing this right but OK I have added the template. The "disparities" thing as written seemed less than neutral to me (disparities in what? number of law enforcement interactions, treatment by law enforcement) but not going to belabor itScottinfukie (talk) 07:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I'm sorry for the inconvenience regarding Calum Scott wiki page, since many vandals used sexual preference as a tool for vandalism. I didn't read the whole reference for Calum's personal life & after reading a few times I realized that I have made a mistake. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.72.213.123 (talk) 10:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, that's understandable. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 00:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kara Mia

The reason why I deleted content from Kara Mia is because it is unreference and it is a vandalsim. DerpyFace123 (talk) 06:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DerpyFace123: The content you deleted from that page was referenced, but I don't know enough about those topics to know if the information was true. Don't be surprised if someone else reverts those edits. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 06:36, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

clock tower edit

are you with typo team or something?

bradleyagin 21:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gladamas&oldid=874377025"