User talk:Room218
Multiple edits on Korea
Hi Room218, Please be sure to follow WP:3RR, the three-revert rule. I don't think you have violated it, I'm just writing to make sure you're aware of the policy. --Reuben 20:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Reuben, this editor is already violating 3RR. The edits from IP addresses User:Room218's IP socks and attempted to circumvent 3RR in Kofun period (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Joseon Dynasty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), and Korea under Japanese rule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). For example, , , , and have been confirmed as
Kofun period (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 1st revert: Room218 15:49, 10 November 2006
- 2nd revert: Room218 19:38, 10 November 2006
- 3rd revert: 75.7.7.49 03:55, 11 November 2006
- 4th revert: 75.7.7.49 08:47, 11 November 2006
Joseon Dynasty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 1st revert: Room218 15:26, 8 November 2006
- 2nd revert: Room218 18:15, 8 November 2006
- 3rd revert: Room218 04:36, 9 November 2006
- 4th revert: Room218 10:58, 9 November 2006
- 5th revert: 75.6.246.2 15:05, 9 November 2006
- 6th revert: Room218 15:49, 10 November 2006
Korea under Japanese rule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 1st revert: Room218 15:49, 10 November 2006
- 2nd revert: Room218 18:03, 10 November 2006
- 3rd revert: Room218 19:38, 10 November 2006
- 4th revert: 75.7.7.49 03:55, 11 November 2006
- 5th revert: 75.7.7.49 08:47, 11 November 2006
--Jjok 05:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah just take a look at the asinine Japanese vandalism in those edit histories. Why don't you complain about them? Room218 05:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- From Japanese's point of view, you are vandalizing too. evenmore ruder. --Ypacaraí 06:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, they also look like meaty, though your avoidance using IP socks are apparent and your reverts are mostly done without discussion. --Jjok 06:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Sometimes I didn't take the time to login, and the vandals surely didn't login. And their socks certainly reverted without any discussion consensus. What's your point? That the vandalism started by Japanese nationalists is fine, but reverting it is wrong? Do you care about Wikipedia's integrity, or just your point of view? Room218 06:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)