Talk:Ecclesiastical Insurance
Gloucestershire Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Organizations Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Claimants Bill of Rights was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 August 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Ecclesiastical Insurance. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Text of merged article
- The Claimants Bill of Rights is a non-legalese 'survivor friendly' version of Ecclesiastical Insurance protocol begun in July 2016 which relates to how insurers and solicitors deal with abuse cases. It was formulated primarily in relation to abuse claims within the Church of England and Anglican Church, to inform how other churches and their insurance companies respond to abuse survivors. It was arrived at by negotiation with a survivor as part of her settlement, with the help of a solicitor campaigner from MACSAS, an organisation which supports church abuse survivors. It covers such areas as fairness, respect and empathy in settlement process, pastoral care, access to counselling, statute of limitations, power imbalance, medical evaluation, Joint Settlement Meeting (“JSM”), confidentiality clauses.
Copied here for ease of reference.--Mervyn (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Ref for this if appropriate is: http://www.ecclesiastical.com/fororganisations/claims/abuse-claims/index.aspx --Mervyn (talk) 16:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Link to Lycetts
Added link to Lycetts(new page) - one of the subsidiaries of Ecclesiastical.[1][2]Joelionheart (talk) 11:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Elliott Review. Criticism of Ecclesiastical & Archbishop Welby's office
New section added. Needs developping. But made a start.Joelionheart (talk) 17:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Criticism by Bishops
New section addded. Hope it's accurate. Not yet complete and will almost certainly need further addition and editing. Sad to see branded logo disappear - I thought it was customary to have corporate logos on wiki. Apologies for my error. Joelionheart (talk) 20:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Added new history section
To make it easier for readers and to add more context to the history of the company. Hope I have cited everything correctly! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.171.128.165 (talk) 09:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 108.171.128.165 (talk) 11:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Updated history section
Added more detail and references to history section, particularly around founding members
Was unable to reference the specific PDF from Companies House but worth taking a look! Pauleccles84 (talk) 11:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Infobox amends
Updated info box with founder info and former names as cited in history section and updated parent company and subsidiaries to accurately reflect structure. All changes made to ensure consistency with cited sources in the article.
Tried to add a logo but not sure of best way to do this as it was previously removed from WikiCommons, please can you advise the best course of action? Pauleccles84 (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Core Groups
Updated Elliott Review section with cited reference to criticism of Ecclesiastical lawyer present at pastoral core groups.[3] Joelionheart (talk) 14:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Open Letter to Welby
New section added. Open Letter to Welby concerning amongst other things Ecclesiastical's litigation strategies, signed by 20 people including senior members of CofE Synod and a founding member of Archbishop's Council and others.[4] Joelionheart (talk) 15:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Affiliation to Church of England
New section added. With several references in media to confusion and uncertainty about its relationship to Church of England, this new section will hopefully clarify these questions. Have moved the Gloucester Cathedral celebration with reading of letter from Archbishop Welby to this new section - seems correct section for this citation. Hope fellow editors will agree. Joelionheart (talk) 23:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Julie Macfarlane
New section added with hopefully accurate citations. This article has developed considerably since Jan 2017 and is likely to develop further with all that is emerging at IICSA - so it'll be important that the structure is able to properly contain various criticisms in line with other articles. Not sure whether this is best done by putting all the criticisms under one header. What do others think? Conscious that alot more work is probably required on the structure of the article so that it can become the best that it can be, which all editors would hopefully wish for, without losing any of the citations obviously. Joelionheart (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ http://www.ecclesiastical.com/general/careers/graduatescheme/a-brief-introduction/index.aspx
- ^ http://www.netimesmagazine.co.uk/10-questions-angus-keate/
- ^ "Sarah Mullally welcomed by survivors as Church battles string of abuse criticisms". Christian Today. 19 Dec 2017. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
- ^ "Archbishop pressed to bring in mandatory reporting of abuse". Ekklesia. Retrieved 14 January 2019.