Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Danainlondon
Danainlondon
- Danainlondon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
04 February 2019
– This SPI case is open.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Cosykenzo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Cosy re-added (1) Dana's spam (2, 3) to Open banking. At present all 3 of Cosy's edits have inserted Centtrip into articles. Cabayi (talk) 12:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The page User:Cosykenzo was not created by myself but by a friend who does not have the same conflict of interest as I. I reached out to them as they have had more Wikipedia experience and asked what I can do in regards to the claims being made against myself by Melcous as well as others, as I realised I had done something wrong and wanted to do my best to revert the damage. Instead of providing advice, User:Cosykenzo created an account and began reverting my edits. This is not what I had requested and I am now disheartened to see what was initially a decision to fix the situation to actually make it worse. I asked User:Cosykenzo to delete the account but have since learnt this is not possible.
I have no intention to break guidelines or hurt others and rather my previous mistakes have been a misunderstanding in which I am embarrassed. Moving forward, I am currently proposing edits on Talk pages rather than editing myself as per User:Melcous explained to me on my talk page. Any further discussion would be much appreciated. Danainlondon (talk) 12:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)