User talk:Gaelan
Appearance
i didn't understand what made you think that the article isn't constructive.Can you eleborate?I have even cited the required references for the article.119.235.48.170 (talk) 06:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
- Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
- News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
- Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
- Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
- Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
- Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
- Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
- News from the WMF: News from WMF
- Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
- Essay: How
- Humour: Village pump
- From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
Thank you for your help, Gaelan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namtranhoang1992 (talk • contribs) 04:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Restoring removed warnings
For this, read WP:BLANKING. Hick Hick (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Hick Hick: Huh, didn't know about that. Thanks. Gaelan 💬✏️ 18:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- NO worries! I wasn't having a go. It was just so you didn't compromise your own good efforts. Hick Hick (talk) 18:36, 5 February 2019 (UTC)