Klamath River (Hydroelectric Project)
Everything in the article is relevant to the topic which is the Water Commission Act of 1913. One thing I did find slightly distracting is the contents section just below the introduction.
It seemed that all the information was correct and to date. I think it was a good idea to include court rulings such as the Lux v. Haggin California Supreme Court ruling. It helps add context and more information as to why we have these water rights.
The article seemed to be neutral and didn't put his or her two sense. It was all based on facts and no opinions. Nothing was underrepresented, in fact some things could have been explained in further detail such as the court rulings and how the gold rush plays a role in these water rights.
There is only one external link and it works. All other links that are attached to the article also work. I think this person covered most of the facts with citations although the references section at the bottom is quite short compared to all the links that are given throughout the article. These sources are from reliable places with no bias.
The only edits that other people used seem to be with the links and sources and nothing with the actual article.
 | This is a user sandbox of Klamath River (Hydroelectric Project). You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
This template should only be used in the user namespace.This template should only be used in the user namespace.