Talk:PureScript
Appearance
Proposed improvements:
Add the following sections:
Code examples
- At least a "Hello World"
- Maybe also a JavaScript FFI example, highlightling the ease of integration with existing JS-codebases/frameworks
Implementations
- Mention alternative implementations, in particular purescript-native which targets C++ as a backend instead of EcmaScript.
Applications
- Industry: There are already several companys which rely on PureScript for a significant portion of their codebase. A few of the major ones would be worth mentioning here, underlining the real-world significance and strength of PureScript.
Ecosystem
- documentation on pursuit
- Pulp
- Bower
- psc-package
- Editor integrations (vscode, atom, vim/emacs)
Community
- Maybe mention the discourse, github, slack channels, ...
Future Directions
- Which aspects of the language are stable, which are in the progress of being extended & improved?
- Are there any essential design-principles that drive the evolution of the language? E.g. in C++ the motto is "you should not have to pay for what you don't use"... are there any similar philosophies in the evolution of PureScript?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.185.75.42 (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)