Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Offend/Archive
Appearance
Offend
- Offend (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
21 March 2019
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- KB3035583 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Both appears to already know how to fight vandalism once the accounts are created. INeedSupport :3 23:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- @L235: Here some diffs for you then.
- [1] (by KB3035583). This user was created on March 21 at 19:04 UTC, and literally around 30 minutes later starts doing some anti-vandal work.
- [2] (by Offend). This shows something similar too. This user was created on March 13 at 15:40 UTC and literally an hour later the user started some anti-vandalism work.
Also,
- [3] (by KB3035583). This user created the userpage at the creation date.
- [4] (by Offend). This user also created the userpage at the creation date.
Notice how both of the userpages has them introducing themselves. INeedSupport :3 02:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]Additional information needed - @INeedSupport: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
- At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
- At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
- In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.
- If your sole evidence is that both users know how to revert vandalism, I think you're going to need some more than that. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:08, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'm returning this to curequest. I would personally decline here but I know CUs who may well decide to check. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Declined - there is insufficient evidence to suggest a check is warranted. Closing with no action. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:47, 22 March 2019 (UTC)