User talk:Possibly

Bridal Procession on the Hardangerfjord

Nice work! Sam Sailor 08:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Somehow the significance of the work was missed in the nomination.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 08:57, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Typically happens when we forget to properly do all steps of WP:BEFORE. Do you want me to set up automatical archiving of your talk page? Sam Sailor 10:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator appears to be ultra-experienced. I guess everyone makes mistakes.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Hey, I just wanted to say thanks. Paul Couvrette's article is teaching me about how to be a Wikipedia contributor without going out of bounds. Your edits and the steps you've taken have helped a lot. Cheers LawrenceTemple (talk) 03:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Raspet edits

Hi there,

Thanks for your input on the Sean Raspet article. I've gone back and inserted some new sources and changed with the language a bit, which I hope helps with the article. Let me know if you have any thoughts, and thanks again!

Dslsherman (talk) 01:33, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. I took out the first sentence of the second paragraph, as, well, it was written for an art audience and not a general Wikipedia audience. it also just repeated in floral language what the first paragraph said. I added back the reference you deleted, further down (please do not delete refs, as I said earlier on your talk page!).

I also have to note, since you are here only to edit Sean Raspet, from the looks of it, that Wikipedia has a very stringent Conflict of Interest policy. If you are connected to Sean Raspet, or being paid to do so, you should not be editing the page. See WP:COI and WP:COIN. Thanks for your note. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Waugh redux at ANI

FYI, Jesse Waugh is up at ANI. The thread mentions your old IP.--Theredproject (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I just saw that. Total waste of time. You're a great editor and a very valuable contributor to the wiki. Just ignore the personal attacks.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Cortis & Sonderegger) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Cortis & Sonderegger.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice article, interesting subject matter

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 15:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New sections on the RfC for List of Photographers

Hey there. I've added new sections to address your additional concerns about sources being cited if the information is in the corresponding article and the number of times a source is used in the list. If you have any additional concerns about the edits you reverted, please add them so that we can address all of your concerns in this RfC. Thanks! Qono (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

john fekner page

Thank you. You're doing work on the John Fekner page! Edit at will according to Wikipedia guidelines. ThatMontrealIP Graywalls Fekner 19:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)