User talk:Equni
request edit
I have read the article concerning the Politecnico on Wikipedia and I inform you that is full of wrong information and many of the cited references are old and have been challenged and rectified.
Quotations laws are no longer present as a new federal law came into force January 1, 2015. The new cantonal law cited was challenged in the Federal Court in Lausanne (the Supreme Court) as unconstitutional.
The list of the Italian Ministry dates back to 1993 and is no longer current.
You have not mentioned that the Polytechnic has been recognized ,the judgment of the Federal Administrative Court in August 2013 established that Politecnico is recognized in the Swiss university system.
You have not mentioned quality certification ISO 9001 2008 and Eduqua.
The reference number 4 is not about the Politecnico.
The article cited as a reference 8 has been challenged by a reply published on the same site as the Cimea that you have not published.
The reference 11 cites an article that is not about the Politecnico .
The references 5 cites the list of CRUS that the Federal Administrative Court ruled to have no legal value.
The reference 9 cites the list of DECS that is not a list of the recognized universities but only of those accredited.
The judgment cited in reference 12 has not refused accreditation after a quality control negative but ruled that it is not possible in principle apply for accreditation of individual courses without first having received institutional accreditation.
The Politecnico is really not yet accredited but is recognized from the swiss law and is not a degree mills as appears reading the article.
The accreditation is not a recognitzion by the State and is not a mandatory in Switzerland.
The our activity is fully legal and the overall reading the article puts in doubt.
Were not mentioned or referred as references a various judgments of Swiss courts that have ruled that to be accredited or not has no bearing on the right to confer university degrees and that accreditation is simply a mark of quality that should not be confused with the recognition by the law.Equni (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
[edit]Would you please stop misusing the tlk page of the article. In particular, bnking it is not acceptable. Especially if you are avoiding the bock.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)