Jump to content

User talk:2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:E454:D78D:E92F:E1E6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2602:306:cfce:1ee0:e454:d78d:e92f:e1e6 (talk) at 01:37, 3 May 2019 (→‎My Cop-Bot Record: 114 Reverts/Hour !!! Beat that, sukas!: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

My Cop-Bot Record: 114 Reverts/Hour !!! Beat that, sukas!

YAHOO! Who says my KopBot 1200 is overpowered, making normal people act like inconsiderate, destructive bullies and needs regulation? VROOM-VROOOM!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reverting Shortcuts WP:RV WP:REV

This page in a nutshell: Revert vandalism on sight, but revert an edit made in good faith only with an explanation and after careful consideration.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reverting#When_to_revert When to revert WP:QUO

Revert only when necessary Reverting is appropriate mostly for vandalism or other disruptive edits. If you see a good-faith edit which you feel does not improve the article, make a good-faith effort to reword instead of reverting it. If there is a dispute, editors should work towards consensus.

Explain reverts Shortcut WP:REVEXP Edit summaries, always a good practice, are particularly important when reverting. Provide a valid and informative explanation including, if possible, a link to the Wikipedia principle you believe justifies the reversion. Try to remain available for dialogue, especially in the half-day or so after reverting.

A reversion is a complete rejection of the work of another editor and if the reversion is not adequately supported then the reverted editor may find it difficult to assume good faith. This is one of the most common causes of an edit war. A substantive explanation also promotes consensus by alerting the reverted editor to the problem with the original edit. The reverted editor may then be able to revise the edit to correct the perceived problem. The result will be an improved article, a more knowledgeable editor and greater harmony.
--2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:E454:D78D:E92F:E1E6 (talk) 01:37, 3 May 2019 (UTC)E1E6[reply]