User talk:HandThatFeeds

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith Johnston (talk • contribs) 16:17, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, you have reverted my edits on the white privilege page regarding white privilege as a social phenomenon. I reverted the original edits because they are subject to an ongoing talk page discussion which then became as Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion which has not yet reached a consensus. As I told the original editor it was inappropriate to make the changes proposed prior to consensus. You were aware of that discussion and the lack of consensus when you made the edits reverting my edits. I plan to revert the edits again until we have a consensus. If you wish to dispute this I suggest we take this to arbitration now. Keith Johnston (talk) 14:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

You removed content from the article while the discussion was ongoing. You were the one making changes "prior to consensus." If you revert those edits again before consensus is reached, you'll be edit warring. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 20:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks the relevant talk page discussion, on whether or not white privilege was a sociological concept, began on 31 October. The original edits were made after that date and prior to consensus. I plan to revert the edits again until we have a consensus. If you wish to dispute this I suggest we take this to arbitration now. Keith Johnston (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

"Arbitration" implies WP:ARBCOM which... ain't happenin'. If you want to do an WP:RFC, feel free to try that, but I don't think it's going to end up with the results you want. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 16:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

WP:3 is fine if your happy? Keith Johnston (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2019 (UTC)