Jump to content

Talk:Auto-brewery syndrome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hahopkin (talk | contribs) at 20:39, 17 January 2020 (Update Symbiosis assignment details). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconMedicine: Gastroenterology Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Gastroenterology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2020 and 28 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Camille4397 (article contribs).

Is citation 9 or 10 unreliable? Or both?

The sentence in the 'symptoms' section for which both citations 9 and 10 are provided has an 'unreliable medical source' tag. Which of these sources is being questioned as potentially unreliable. They both have potential problems Vice has a reputation for less-than-bulletproof journalistic standards, especially about scientific (and *especially* about medical (and **especially** about medical subjects to do with intoxicating substances)). Steven Gundry, while a doctor, has made claims referred to on his page as 'pseudoscientific'. Do both of these citations need to be reviewed by someone far more qualified by me, or removed and replaced with a more rigourous source? I'm not all that familiar with evidence requirements for medical pages. Thanks in advance Devgirl (talk) 20:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]