User talk:Black Kite

For Talk Page Archives, click here.

“You’re obliged to pretend respect for people and institutions you think absurd. You live attached in a cowardly fashion to moral and social conventions you despise, condemn, and know lack of all foundation." Octave Mirbeau

2601:143:4200:E070:0:0:0:0/64

Hello, Black Kite! Continuation of this story. Could you set the semi-protection on the page "Crimean Tatars"?--Nicoljaus (talk) 09:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from oscillococcinum

I am blocked for wanting to remove soapboxing? Jfbongarçon (talk) 10:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're blocked for twice removing sourced facts from the article and then calling the user who correctly reverted you "fascistic". You are not (currently) blocked from any other page except Oscillococcinum but I would strongly suggest not doing the same thing elsewhere. Black Kite (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

High BK

Could I ask a favour, never having had an article pulled as non-notable, that I was working on? The Hayley McLaughlin article—can you direct me to where I might find the last version of it, before it was deleted? I had put in a great deal of work, repairing citations, and if she does indeed become recognizably notable in future, I would rather we not start from scratch. (For a start, there were at least a half dozen good citations there, and for such entertainment articles, I have no time to reproduce already performed research.). Respond here, given my IP status? Cheers, thanks. [The former Prof.] 2601:246:C700:19D:B160:B273:E4A3:8B0F (talk) 06:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have been watching the Patrick F. Philbin page, and have fixed vandalism a few times (as have others, there). Even though it would deny me access, perhaps lock it down for three days, until after this fellow is out of the limelight? Your call. Cheers. 2601:246:C700:19D:B160:B273:E4A3:8B0F (talk) 06:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]