User talk:RA0808
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
- Be civil.
- I am not an administrator and I cannot undelete a deleted page, please contact the deleting administrator for that.
- I may rename or consolidate sections for the sake of organization, but will never change the text of your message.
- Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. Use the {{ping}} on your talk page or a {{talkback}} template here to remind me.
- To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link.
- Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- Remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Do not edit war their page
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bex_Taylor-Klaus&oldid=853520281 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bex_Taylor-Klaus&oldid=872935372 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bex_Taylor-Klaus&oldid=879959633 Are your sources. Be more polite.Mantr33r (talk) 13:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Mantr33r: No one is being rude to you, nor am I engaging in an edit war. Please note that you cannot use Wikipedia as a source for other Wikipedia articles, this is to avoid circular referencing (see WP:CIRC for more details). I'm sure that you can find a source describing Taylor-Klaus' sex at birth and add content to the article that way. Also, claiming that editors are pushing a political agenda or deliberately obfuscating information is not conducive to a collaborative atmosphere. If in doubt open a discussion at the article's talk page to reach consensus. RA0808 talkcontribs 14:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Why
Why would you not allow images of certain crossdressers and do allow images of others? Your descisions on the pages are not based on logic but on pure taste. And will make sure this is known Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Sissyjoyce12: The images already in use in those articles serve an encyclopedic purpose to illustrate the concept. Your replacement of these established images (seemingly with images of yourself or someone you are affiliated with) does not serve any additional encyclopedic purpose to justify the changes besides seemingly self-promotion. If you are coming to this with an approach of good faith improvements to Wikipedia then I definitely recommend starting a discussion on one of the appropriate WikiProjects and develop a consensus of where improvements are most needed. Hope this helps, RA0808 talkcontribs 16:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
complete bullshit. Do you have ownership of the picture you uploaded on the sissy page? And the picture that i have there is a way clearer and informative picture then that idiotic one you just uploaded. Don´t be like that lol. Very sad to see. I WILL report this. Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
The picture YOU posted in the sissy page can easily be mistakes for a regular crossdresser. The one i posted even has a collar with the word sissy on it. Seriously. And stop the blaming for self promotion. Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
"Seemingly" self promotion. Nice one Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
. Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Nightingale reed warbler
I updated the page since ICAN says it is extinct but you undid my edit I supposed you were confused with the Saipan reed warbler that also lived on the island and is still living — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivian934 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Vivian934: Hi Vivian, the only reason I reverted your edit is that it made an assertion about it being "likely extirpated" without providing a source. I know that based on the IUCN status that is probably correct but we can't use synthesis or original research so it just needs a source to have that statement added back in. Hope this helps! RA0808 talkcontribs 16:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok, bro
Thanks. The rambler who added the paragraph I mentioned also added his ramblings on a few other pages as well.