User:Yujia zhou/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: (link)
- History of anime https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_anime
Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
this article has some issues such as original research , citation needed. The article is not natural; it may be biased in some respects.So this article can be improved when those problem get fixed. But also this article has reliable reference to reference the fact and using different scours from different author and publication.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Yes ,the beginning of the article contains an introduction that clearly and concisely describes the topic of the topic.
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Yes, main section of this article are briefly introduces in the lead.
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
No, the lead is introduces the information that present in the article.
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
It explains the content of the article in a clear and simple way, without excessive emphasis on details.

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
the content of the article is related to the theme, is to introduce the history of animation.
Is the content up-to-date?
I have not found any content that needs to be updated, but there are some non-neutral contents that need to be modified
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Some concepts need to add citations
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
the article does not address historically underrepresented populations or themes? Content evaluation

Is the article neutral?
The article has some unneutral expressions
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
The article is not heavily biased towards any particular position
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
I think the point is a little overexpressed
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
The article does not explicitly ask the reader to change his or her position
Tone and balance evaluation

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Limited sentences need citation to support
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? the source of the article is thorough
Are the sources current? Yes
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
- Sources written by different authors, who has different nation and culture background.
Check a few links. Do they work?
All links are works.
Sources and references evaluation

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- I think this is a well-written article but just a little bit not easy to read.
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
The are no grammatical errors.
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
Most of part of this article are well organized but some part are bit mass to read.

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, there are several picture to help reader understanding
Are images well-captioned? yes
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? I think the layout of the picture is a bit ordinary and not attractive enough

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
The development history of animation should be shown concisely and clearly in a way that the public can understand, and the historical order should be respected
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Rated C-class, Top-importance and belong to wiki projects.
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Wikipedia needs to be neutral, free of any subjective expression, and ever sentences need to be reliable and easy to read.

What is the article's overall status?
- A good article but can be better
What are the article's strengths?
Contains factually accurate and verifiable information that covers a wide range of topics, is neutral in opinion, is stable and, where possible, illustrated by relevant images with appropriate copyright licenses.
How can the article be improved?
- Add a missing citation and modify a sentence that is not quite neutral
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
- The article is complete, and well-developed.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~