Jump to content

Talk:Optometry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vorbee (talk | contribs) at 09:31, 8 December 2020 (Optometrists - how do they differ from opticians?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMedicine: Ophthalmology C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Template:Vital article


Constant Loiseau

Constant Loiseau is aparently the inventor of the instrument that is the basis of the modern Optometer , yet he is not even mentioned in this article. This should be remedied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.101.79.66 (talk) 12:06, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Optometrists are not Ophthalmic Opticians

Optometrists are not Ophthalmic Opticians dear Chrisieboy. I do not know why you want to upset the world community of optometrists? What grudge do you have against optometrists? Which school did you go to? The title optometrist was adopted long time ago throughout the world. No country uses this outdated and confusing title. In the UK the title Optometrist was approved by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II hence we have a College of Optometrists which was granted a Royal Charter by our Queen. I am sure you can read and write otherwise you would not be editing Wikipedia. You obviously do not understand the history of British medicine and related professions and you edit as if you are very knowledgeable. Leave it to those people who are trained in the field and who genuinely understand these matters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.193.194 (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2.27.75.26 (talk) 17:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree, I have again changed the definition. I suspect there are “lay people” who are attempting to change it back.

Regards

Dr M Hope Mjhope77 (talk) 15:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is a persistent attempt by anonymous user to mutilate the definition of Doctor of Optometry by removing the UK from it, despite postgraduate Doctor of Optometry courses being available in the UK for over 10 years.

I have requested wikipedia remove editorial privileges from this anonymous user. Mjhope77 (talk) 22:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://www2.aston.ac.uk/study/courses/doctor-of-optometry Mjhope77 (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overall I think the page is excellent. Does anyone know of a way to access the early texts on optometry mentioned? It would be wonderful if viewers could find links to the mentioned works and actually see what the founders of the field said about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uofm17 (talkcontribs) 08:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History section.

to me it seems more a history of spectacles than optometry as a profession. it's somehow suggested that optometrists are not opticians, but it's totally unclear when and how that separation occurred. who was the first optometrist? what were the underlying conditions that led to this profession? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.95.252.118 (talk) 22:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested improvement

The article could be improved if, under either the section entitled "Definition" or the section entitled "Etymology", it explained how optomwetrists differ from opticians. Vorbee (talk) 09:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]